Source: XpertHR upfront Date: 19/07/2010 Publisher: XpertHR

Avoiding discrimination in redundancy


The case of De Belin v Eversheds Legal Services Ltd highlights the tension between the principle of equal treatment between men and women and ensuring pregnant women and those on maternity leave are protected from unlawful discrimination. 

Also

Redundancy: top 10 pitfalls for employers The pundits may be telling us the recession is past its worst, but redundancies are still having a huge impact. 

Sexism ruling prompts redundancy rethink Employers have been urged to look closely at their redundancy criteria after a tribunal ruled that law firm Eversheds unfairly dismissed a male employee because it feared a discrimination claim if it axed a pregnant colleague. 

XpertHR's FAQs section provides information on all aspects of redundancy rights. 

To read the rest of this article you must login
Existing users login here

Compliance

Keep on the right side
of employment law

Good Practice

Engage your people to
achieve your objectives

Benchmarking

Measure, monitor and
match best practices
 

For more information on XpertHR call 020 8652 4653 or email enquiries@xperthr.co.uk









irs
personnel today
lexisNexis


© Reed Business Information Ltd  Terms & Conditions |  Privacy Policy

XpertHR is designed to work consistently across a range of browsers, including Internet Explorer,
Mozilla Firefox, Opera and Safari. If you find bugs in our site, please contact us. We appreciate feedback.





This Item:

Save

Email

Print