Source: XpertHR upfront Date: 29-05-2012 Publisher: XpertHR

Unfair dismissal qualifying period: case study 2


We provide a second case study around the unfair dismissal qualifying period. 

This case study looks at a situation in which an employer dismisses a new employee for refusing to carry out her duties because she believes that there is a health and safety risk. Despite her short service, the employee is able to claim unfair dismissal. 

Also

We explain the rules on continuous employment and unfair dismissal in the XpertHR employment law manual

Our table showing the automatically unfair reasons for dismissal in the XpertHR quick reference section sets out the reasons that do not require qualifying service for the employee to bring a claim. 

The XpertHR FAQs section provides answers to questions about continuous employment, for example How would a tribunal interpret continuity of employment? and Will a period of unpaid leave break the employee’s continuity of service? We also answer questions about unfair dismissal, for example What are the qualifying conditions required for an employee to bring a claim of unfair dismissal? and In what circumstances does an employee not need minimum qualifying service to claim unfair dismissal?

To read the rest of this article you must login

Existing users login here Existing Users

Other access problems
Email help desk or call: 0845 671 1110

Request a Demo Learn More about XpertHR

To view the full article request a demo today

XpertHR is the leading online resource for employment law, HR good practice and benchmarking.

Let us show you how your organisation could save time and money with XpertHR.









This Item: