Source: IRS Employment Review Issue: 858 Date: 03-11-2006 Publisher: IRS

Tribunal jurisdiction/statutory grievance procedure: Effect of tribunal's 'informal' determination of claims

TOPICS:
terms, conditions and employee rights policies and procedures
employment tribunals and courts
termination of employment tribunal procedures and penalties

CASES: below is a list of cases discussed in this article. Click the case title for more XpertHR resources on the case and related cases.

Excel Management Ltd v Lumb EAT/0121/06 (1 report)


Where, because of the operation of s.32(3) of the Employment Act 2002, a tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear prematurely filed claims, the fact that it went on to hear and "informally" determine the claims could not prevent the employer from later exercising its right to put its case before the same tribunal, once it had jurisdiction to hear the claims.

KEY POINTS

In Excel Management Ltd v Lumb 1 the EAT holds:

  • A tribunal that, with the agreement of the parties, had heard evidence and reached preliminary non-binding conclusions on claims in respect of which it lacked jurisdiction because they had been filed too early in breach of s.32(3) of the Employment Act 2002, was wrong to deny the employer the right to adduce fresh evidence and make further submissions at a later hearing of the claims before the same tribunal.
To read the rest of this article you must login

Existing users login here Existing Users

Other access problems
Email help desk or call: 0845 671 1110

Request a Demo Learn More about XpertHR

To view the full article request a demo today

XpertHR is the leading online resource for employment law, HR good practice and benchmarking.

Let us show you how your organisation could save time and money with XpertHR.









This Item: