skip navigation
Your selected item:
AUTHOR: Tina McKevitt
CASES: below is a list of cases discussed in this article. Click the case title for more XpertHR resources on the case and related cases.Johnston v Chief Constable of Humberside Police [2009] ET/1804303/08 (1 report) Kenyon v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary [2009] ET/3100445/08 (1 report) Jeram v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary [2009] ET/3102933/08 (1 report) Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] ET/2317823/07 & ET/2328817/08 (1 report) Carver v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2008] ET/1301512/08 (1 report)
This article summarises the main issues and outcomes in five tribunal cases brought by police officers under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Although the decisions are not binding on other tribunals, they provide useful illustrations for police forces of situations that have led to disability discrimination claims.
On this page: Introduction HR manager pressurised dyslexic probationary officer into resigning Assumptions about the effects of multiple sclerosis gave rise to disability discrimination Failure to allow police officer to qualify for enhanced competence-related threshold pay was discriminatory No disability discrimination against an officer with obsessive compulsive disorder Medical retirement of blind officer not disability discrimination
Back to top
Introduction
When the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 came into force on 2 December 1996, its employment provisions covered police civilian staff, but did not extend to police constables who, technically, are office holders and not employees.
Let us show you how XpertHR can immediately benefit your organisation. XpertHR is the UK's most cost-effective HR online information source for:
For more information on XpertHR call 020 8652 4653 or email enquiries@xperthr.co.uk
This Item:
Related Items: