skip navigation
Your selected item:
AUTHOR: Tina McKevitt
CASES: below is a list of cases discussed in this article. Click the case title for more XpertHR resources on the case and related cases.Plottke v Swallowfield plc [2009] ET/1701402/08 (1 report) Morton v The Governing Body of Archdiocese of Birmingham Holy Trinity Catholic Media Arts College [2009] ET/1310248/08 (1 report) Handley v Robert Bell and Anthony Wing t/a Robert Bell & Co [2009] ET/2601551/08 (1 report) Bottomer v Chamberlains Estate Agents and others [2009] ET/1307016/08 & ET/1307875/08 (1 report) Aslett v Les Femmes de Menage Ltd [2009] ET/1101490/09 (1 report)
This article summarises the main issues and outcomes in five tribunal cases brought by pregnant employees or employees on maternity leave. Although the decisions are not binding on other tribunals, they provide useful illustrations for employers of situations that have led to pregnancy and maternity leave discrimination claims.
On this page: Introduction Employer's failure to implement individual risk assessment led to discrimination against pregnant employee “Revised role” and failure to notify part-time employee of full-time vacancies did not breach employee’s maternity rights Discrimination against employee who missed out on discretionary Christmas bonus while on maternity leave and was not allowed to return to work on reduced hours Employer discriminated against pregnant employee in selecting her for redundancy Purported redundancy dismissal was not on grounds of pregnancy but was nevertheless unfair
Back to top
Introduction
There are numerous statutory rights and obligations associated with pregnancy, childbirth and maternity leave.
Let us show you how XpertHR can immediately benefit your organisation. XpertHR is the UK's most cost-effective HR online information source for:
For more information on XpertHR call 020 8652 4653 or email enquiries@xperthr.co.uk
This Item:
Related Items: