Your selected item:

Patel v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and another EAT/0225/09

The links in the right-hand column below give you a range of options for proceeding with this item. >more

Source: XpertHR case law stop press

Date: 29/01/2010

Publisher: XpertHR

Patel v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and another EAT/0225/09

disability discrimination | meaning of disability | concurrent conditions

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has considered whether or not a disabled employee with two related impairments that she suffered concurrently but that individually did not last 12 months each qualify for protection under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.

Mrs Patel was a teacher.

To read the rest of this article you must login

Existing users login here

Username: Forgotten password
request email reminder Password: Other access problems email help desk or call: 0845 671 1110

Athens users | Shibboleth users

Not a subscriber?

Let us show you how XpertHR can immediately benefit your organisation. XpertHR is the UK's most cost-effective HR online information source for:

Compliance

Keep on the right side
of employment law

Good Practice

Engage your people to
achieve your objectives

Benchmarking

Measure, monitor and
match best practices

For more information on XpertHR call 020 8652 4653 or email enquiries@xperthr.co.uk

© Reed Business Information Ltd Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
XpertHR is designed to work consistently across a range of browsers, including Internet Explorer,
Mozilla Firefox, Opera and Safari. If you find bugs in our site, please contact us. We appreciate feedback.

This Item:

Save this item

Email this item to a colleague

Open printer-friendly version

Open in Microsoft Word