Are the requirements of the forthcoming Equality Act out of line with government policy on health and work, and in particular the return to work of people on incapacity benefit or absence leave who are covered by the new law's disability discrimination requirements?
This was the view of one employment lawyer speaking at a conference in London yesterday. I was at the event, organised by law firm Withers, and chaired a question and answer session. Head of Employment at Withers Meriel Schindler made the point to delegates that the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people in the Equality Act fails to acknowledge the shift in thinking in government related to work and health brought about since the appointment of Dame Carol Black as national director of work and health.
This was the view of one employment lawyer speaking at a conference in London yesterday. I was at the event, organised by law firm Withers, and chaired a question and answer session. Head of Employment at Withers Meriel Schindler made the point to delegates that the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people in the Equality Act fails to acknowledge the shift in thinking in government related to work and health brought about since the appointment of Dame Carol Black as national director of work and health.
The wording of the Equality Act states that employers should take such steps as it is reasonable to avoid disadvantage related to a "physical feature" of the work environment or "provision of an auxiliary aid". The new Act wraps the Disability Discrimination Act into a statute covering disability and eight other areas of discrimination.
Schindler argued yesterday that this focus on the built environment and auxiliary aids ignores the issues about management style and the need to look at the employees life in the round, sometimes referred to as the biopsychosocial model. This is ironic given that the same government that drafted the Equality Act also backed Black's recommendations. "This is a real missed opportunity in the legislation because it doesn't take us far enough," Schindler said.
This will be especially problematic for employers when dealing with mental health issues, including those related to stress, and this was the key concern of the delegates I talked to at the conference yesterday. Schindler's point is that there was an opportunity to use the law to encourage employers to address the management issues that often cause or aggravate employees' mental health problems. This would prevent the problems developing and avoid both the risk of employment tribunal claims and also costly long term absence leave.
We will have to wait to see whether this leads to more case law and the risk of more big payouts to staff suffering stress at work once the Equality Act comes into force in October.
Schindler argued yesterday that this focus on the built environment and auxiliary aids ignores the issues about management style and the need to look at the employees life in the round, sometimes referred to as the biopsychosocial model. This is ironic given that the same government that drafted the Equality Act also backed Black's recommendations. "This is a real missed opportunity in the legislation because it doesn't take us far enough," Schindler said.
This will be especially problematic for employers when dealing with mental health issues, including those related to stress, and this was the key concern of the delegates I talked to at the conference yesterday. Schindler's point is that there was an opportunity to use the law to encourage employers to address the management issues that often cause or aggravate employees' mental health problems. This would prevent the problems developing and avoid both the risk of employment tribunal claims and also costly long term absence leave.
We will have to wait to see whether this leads to more case law and the risk of more big payouts to staff suffering stress at work once the Equality Act comes into force in October.
| Tweet |





Comments (2)
Interesting issue Noel - but could you say more about what Meriel Schindler's actual point was? The duty to make reasonable adjustments doesn't change much under the Equality Act and I hadn't really thought about a specific problem in relation to the Black Review
Posted by Darren Newman | July 11, 2010 9:04 AM
Posted on July 11, 2010 09:04
Meriel Schindler did outline changes to disability law in the Equality Act but her comments on reasonable adjustments were not about changes but about a missed opportunity. As I understand it what she meant was that Act should have gone further by putting more emphasis on steps employers should take to avoid disadvantage which related to the employee's whole life, for example mental health problems that could be caused or aggravated by management style. She did discuss the range of possible adjustments listed in the Disabiity Discrimination Act, some of which touch on Black's recommendations, but she seemed to be arguing that the Equality Act could have taken things further and suggested that employees were more proactive 'upstream' to identify problems earlier and prevent problemst leading to incapacity or a claim of disability discrimination.
Posted by Noel O'Reilly
|
July 12, 2010 10:33 AM
Posted on July 12, 2010 10:33