One of the best and most eloquent voices in the UK HR blogging community provides today's post in our ongoing "If I could change one thing about HR..." series: Redundant Public Servant. As his pen name suggests, Redundant Public Servant is a public servant (and HR professional) who is facing up to the prospect of imminent redundancy from his current role. This personal upheaval has had one very fortunate side-effect: it has given us a remarkable new HR blogging voice. Launched in August 2010, A redundant public servant's blog - described as "news from the front line of deficit reduction" - has quickly established itself as one of the best UK HR blogs, and has resulted in a guest post for the Guardian website. I would like to urge everyone reading this to take a look at his blog. You can also follow Redundant Public Servant on Twitter.
I would also like to take this opportunity to wish Redundant Public Servant every success in his search for a new role, and express my sincere hope that he chooses to continue blogging once this search is over.
Redundant Public Servant: If I could change one thing about HR...
In a longish and moderately successful career in public service I have worked to one guiding principle.
Never let an absence of knowledge prevent you from expressing an opinion.
My adherence to this principle may explain why my career is now hurtling into the buffers of redundancy.
So when I was invited to contribute to this excellent series of posts about HR I did not hesitate. Never mind that some of the foremost HR thinkers and practitioners of our times had had a go at this subject. I set to one side the uniform brilliance of each of their contributions. And, true to the Corinthian spirit of the times, I thought I'd give it a go.
I did do some market research though. I asked a select list of colleagues who are operational managers of one description or another for their views. Ambushing them at drinks machines, in cafeteria queues or in car parks I asked them, "What's the one thing you would change about HR?"
After a baffled silence and, in one instance, a request for me to "stop being weird," I got a variety of responses.
Here's the top five. My colleagues said HR should:
Now I know our HR teams feel the same way. I spoke with our employee support team yesterday and heard a long-known voice on the other end of the 'phone tell me about her life.
"It's all leavers and counter-notices," she said. "It's grinding us all down and there doesn't seem to be an end in sight ... This isn't why I wanted to work in personnel ... And, of course, none of us know what is happening to our jobs."
It was a sad conversation but I have been having quite a few of these recently. What I have also been having though are conversations with people I manage that are getting angrier in tone. Aside from the natural feelings of folks who have been told they are not wanted anymore, what causes most angst just now are things like this:
Seriously though, it feels to me that if ever there was a time, in my part of the world, for managers and HR to make common cause this would be it.
So you'll be pleased perhaps to hear that I am not going to advocate HR be abolished though I was interested to see some of you seem quite keen on this.
No, my one change would be this. For HR never to lose sight of the fact that the H stands for "human". I'm a person and an employee. So are the individuals I manage. Increasingly though we are thinking of ourselves less as the latter and rather more as the former. So HR colleagues need to get to us via that tack rather than appealing to our diminishing instincts as employees. When HR colleagues are next dusting off some bit of process to deploy, pause for a moment to ask how a person, a real life human being, would feel to be on the receiving end? Remember you can always ask a non-HR friend.
All together now ...
- make an effort to understand our problems;
- stop complicating our lives;
- not make things worse;
- not cost so much; and
- be abolished.
Now I know our HR teams feel the same way. I spoke with our employee support team yesterday and heard a long-known voice on the other end of the 'phone tell me about her life.
"It's all leavers and counter-notices," she said. "It's grinding us all down and there doesn't seem to be an end in sight ... This isn't why I wanted to work in personnel ... And, of course, none of us know what is happening to our jobs."
It was a sad conversation but I have been having quite a few of these recently. What I have also been having though are conversations with people I manage that are getting angrier in tone. Aside from the natural feelings of folks who have been told they are not wanted anymore, what causes most angst just now are things like this:
- Cold impersonal communications: Is it impossible to write in a human way while still complying with legal requirements?
- Being asked to do daft things: Why try to insist on carrying on with business as usual when it isn't? Say "no" to exit interviews or performance reviews for folks being made redundant.
- Including the soon to be redundant in round-robin missives about the problems that will hit the organisation after their notice date: THEY DON'T CARE.
- Failing to deliver on promises: If you have said you will do something, offer something or arrange something then do it.
- Expecting people to put their interests on hold while you sort out
your processes: When you're being made redundant you put your own and
your family's interests first. People should not and will not hang
around while management makes decisions at its same old stately rate of
knots.
I feel a chorus of The Farmer and the Cowman
from Oklahoma! coming on.
Seriously though, it feels to me that if ever there was a time, in my part of the world, for managers and HR to make common cause this would be it.
So you'll be pleased perhaps to hear that I am not going to advocate HR be abolished though I was interested to see some of you seem quite keen on this.
No, my one change would be this. For HR never to lose sight of the fact that the H stands for "human". I'm a person and an employee. So are the individuals I manage. Increasingly though we are thinking of ourselves less as the latter and rather more as the former. So HR colleagues need to get to us via that tack rather than appealing to our diminishing instincts as employees. When HR colleagues are next dusting off some bit of process to deploy, pause for a moment to ask how a person, a real life human being, would feel to be on the receiving end? Remember you can always ask a non-HR friend.
All together now ...
HR and the manager should be friends.
Oh, HR and the manager should be friends.
One likes to push a pen, the other likes to cause a row,
But that's no reason why they cain't be friends.
Ordinary folks should stick together,
Ordinary folks should all be pals.
Managers dance with their HR pals,
HR chaps with the management gals.
Oh, HR and the manager should be friends.
One likes to push a pen, the other likes to cause a row,
But that's no reason why they cain't be friends.
Ordinary folks should stick together,
Ordinary folks should all be pals.
Managers dance with their HR pals,
HR chaps with the management gals.
| Tweet |





Comments (6)
Nicely done. As one of the "process pushers" I will attest that the most common failure mode is not understanding the needs of the user. It's caused more rework and poor deployment issues than most people would like to admit.
Posted by Dwane Lay | November 10, 2010 2:49 PM
Posted on November 10, 2010 14:49
What a great post. I do always try to treat people how I would like to be treated myself and this post will be a great reminder to me to always remember the H in HR
Thanks for taking the time to write it and I hope you get another job soon.
Posted by Alison | November 10, 2010 3:13 PM
Posted on November 10, 2010 15:13
Nothing like an old time musical to give us insight into ourselves, right? Sometimes, in the name of caring, we get asked to manage things as though the HR folks have a unique accountability to act as humans, as though managers don't always seem to have the DNA arranged quite right.
Your lyric reminds us that teaming up should give us better insight and answers, which is in everyone's best interest.
Thanks for the view.
Posted by HR Introvert | November 11, 2010 1:54 AM
Posted on November 11, 2010 01:54
Thank you to everyone that has commented so far on Redundant Public Servant's excellent post.
Readers of this post might be interested to know of an uncanny coincidence. Redundant Public Servant is not the only HR blogger to find inspiration in the musical Oklahoma! in the past few days. Earlier this week, the HR Introvert quite coincidentally published a blog post entitled HR Monday Musical – Oklahoma!
Great minds, it would seem, think alike!
Kind regards
Michael
Posted by Michael Carty
|
November 11, 2010 8:05 AM
Posted on November 11, 2010 08:05
Yeehaww! Any post with a musical bent is always on a head start. Good read and love the Angst Agenda that you've shared with us. Critically important.
"Failing to deliver on promises: If you have said you will do something, offer something or arrange something then do it."
What you say. What you do.
Where they overlap, you get trust. That’s cool.
Where they don’t, you get trouble. That’s what you deserve.
I'm off to slap my thigh - cheers!
Posted by Doug Shaw | November 11, 2010 9:29 AM
Posted on November 11, 2010 09:29
Really well expressed. Change that would have a major significance and the main skills are being in touch with things "human" - maybe also being able to carry a song and whistle a happy tune from time-to-time!
Thanks and very best wishes,
Ian
Posted by Ian Welsh | November 11, 2010 11:39 AM
Posted on November 11, 2010 11:39