Could it be the case that perceptions of talent shortages are in fact the result of a shortage of imagination?
Does the existence of a profession called recruiting create the perception of skills shortages?
These were among the questions asked and debated in a fascinating session (or "track," in unconference speak) lead by HRExaminer Editor John Sumser at yesterday's TruLondon unconference (Click here for more about TruLondon, and here for a definition of unconferences).
The debate gave rise to some wide-ranging and extremely compelling perspectives on these issues. It also got me thinking:
- Does talent grow on trees?
What follows are my notes on some of the key points raised in this extremely rich discussion.
Most of the points below come from the wise words of John Sumser. But there are also contributions from other attendees, including China Gorman and Mervyn Dinnen.
The fact that just one hour's discussion produced such a wealth of interesting material should provide some idea of just how rich unconferences can be!
I'd love to get your take on the issues raised here. Please do get in touch!
You can leave a comment via the box below, or contact me directly via Twitter, LinkedIn or Google+.
Is it 'bizarre, aberrant nonsense' to expect talent to grow on trees?
Perceptions of talent shortages often arise because employers believe that talent will arise on its own, without any level of investment or intervention on their part, says Sumser.He described this view as "bizarre, aberrant nonsense," and posed the following question:
- How often are perceived talent shortages actually an acute symptom of over-abundance?
Sebastapol, California - the "next town down" from where John lives in California - is famous as a leading US producer of the Gravenstein apple.
When they are in season, you can't move for Gravensteins. Sebastapol produces upwards of two billion Gravensteins.
Such a "surplus of inventory" creates a buyer's market.
This in turn creates the view that there is "always a better deal to be had out there."
Similar "surplus of inventory" issues help give rise to perceptions of talent shortages.
Does talent grow on trees?
So, does talent grow on trees?
Sumser argues that what feels like a talent shortage might really be an imagination shortage.
Technology can turn "dust into magic." As technology evolves, what seemed impossible today becomes "mundane" 18 months from now.
This has huge implications for the workplace, as "things that didn't look like work become work."
Therefore, "we need to invent questions," says Sumser. Identifying and asking "questions that didn't used to be answerable" is a key growth industry.
Talent shortages aren't necessarily the employees' fault
Managers too often explain talent shortages by resorting to the age-old view that it's the employees' fault (or the fault of the labour market talent pool).
Sumser contends that perceived talent shortages are much more likely to reflect a failure on the part of the manager.
Are employers and recruiters settling for second best?
Resourcing in companies tends to be "sub-optimal," rather than "permanently optimal."
In other words, recruiters and employers too often settle for second best.
It's difficult to hire precisely the right person for the role. Job descriptions effectively become "a moving target," as the role will inevitably continue to evolve once someone has been hired to fill it.
Great recruiters can carve out the optimal fit for any role by recognising the talent that is out there.
The old distinctions between "technical" and "non-technical" jobs are now gone. "I don't know of a job that isn't technical now."
Are qualifications a barrier to talent?
This section brings together my notes on points raised by two other delegates attending this session - top US HR blogger China Gorman, and the UK's very own Mervyn Dinnen.
Here are my notes on what China Gorman had to say:
- The US has arrived at the "ludicrous" situation in which "you even need a college degree to do jobs that don't need college degrees." For example, many roles in the US fast food industry now require a minimum of two years' college education.
- The unemployed are not necessarily unemployable, even if they lack a college degree.
- In order to be effective at the task of creating work, HR needs new proxies of work. HR needs to rethink its proxies of the minimum experience and minimum skills required to perform specific roles.
- Businesses must decide: Do we put the business where the people are, or where it makes the most economic sense to do business? Cost and political/regulatory considerations often win out.
- A
BCG study suggests that the big deficit in HR is strategic workforce
planning. We might define this as the design of jobs and identifying
where the talent is. "This is just not being done."
- Qualifications are often used as a barrier. Recruiters too often think they need to find talent fully-formed.
- The need for recruiters to hit targets risks perpetuating this state of affairs.
- "Does the existence of a profession called recruiting create the perception of skills shortages?"
My take on #TRULondon 2012:
- #TruLondon 2012 (1): Does talent grow on trees?
- #TRULondon 2012 (2): How #HRtech can unlock the potential of 'the video game generation'
- TruLondon Find out more about TruLondon.
- HR, What's on Your Mind? Watch a video of a talk with China Gorman and John Sumser at TRULondon 2012 moderated by Mervyn Dinnen.
- Fact or Fiction: Do Modern leaders really need to manage the generation gap? Watch a video of a great TRULondon session that I sat in on, which featured China Gorman.
- Heather Bussing's TRU London gallery Check out Heather Bussing's photographs from TRULondon on 23 October 2012. My thanks to Heather for her kind permission in allowing me to use the picture of China Gorman and Mervyn Dinnen, above.
- TRULondon 2010: Where HR, recruitment and social media meet
My account of TRULondon 2010.
| Tweet |





Comments (3)
A great post Michael, especially for those of us who missed the event. Thanks for sharing.
I think the issue of Talent Shortages - and how much anxiety this causes - is a function of the cost of making a bad hire. This is in part the financial cost of actually making a hire; and in part the cost in terms of lost business of making the wrong hire (or making that hire only with a considerable time delay).
To the extent that technological advances mean we can hire staff i) more quickly and ii) at lower cost, one theory could be that talent scarcity will "remain" most acute in those sectors where the business cost of not having hired the right people is felt most strongly (IT, sales, etc.). Interested to hear others' views on this...
Posted by Tony Restell | October 24, 2012 11:49 AM
Posted on October 24, 2012 11:49
Thank you for the generous feedback on this post, Tony, and also for the excellent and intriguing comment!
Would your theory also suggest that the cost to employers of making bad hires might actually increase (depending on the extent to which technological advances allow the speed of recruitment/hiring processes to increase?
I'm also very interested to know if you or any other out there have any views on the best ways that employers might tackle the root cause of the problem you identify here: What is the one thing employers should be doing to help them avoid making bad hires in the first place?
Posted by Michael Carty
|
October 24, 2012 3:29 PM
Posted on October 24, 2012 15:29
In my view, as someone who has worked in recruitment marketing for over 20 years, there has been a definite dumbing down in the messages that people, some recruiters and employers alike, put out there these days. In the days of press advertising, the focus was very much on finding the right vehicle for a certain industry sector and/or focusing on a certain part of the country where you knew these people you were looking for to be,and then targeting those mediums/areas with an alluring campaign that appealed to people's emotions - it made them WANT a job that was being advertised even though they were happy in their current position because it spoke to them in a personal and enticing tone, just like other areas of advertising do - cars, holidays, booze etc. etc. Over the past what, 18-20 years however, as the online snowball has got ever bigger as it continues its relentless roll forward, quality, creativity and focus (i.e. researching your target audience, where they live, what they read, how you might get your message in front of them and what you should say) has in many instances been replaced with a scattergun approach - 10 job boards for less than £100 - and a quick cut & pasted job description. Not an advertisement, not a creative vehicle for picking up quality passengers, but a dull, uninspiring, often grammatically inept and endless dirge with no sell within it whatsoever.
I don't believe there is a huge talent shortage. Instead, I believe there is a huge lack of creativity, preparation and forethought. Why? Because technology has made it so simple to fire out any old recruitment message and hope for the best.
I used to work with one of the largest recruiters in the world as the Account Director on their recruitment advertising account. I had a team of 4 working purely on that business. They spent £1.5m a year on advertising, marketing and research. They held regular focus groups with applicants who had responded to their advertising and candidates they had placed within organisations, to find out what made them tick. Where did they loook for jobs? What would they warm to in an ad and what didn't do anything for them etc. A lot of that ground work has disappeared now. The importance of the message and the truly targeted approach (not just searching by age, job title and location on a generalist site like Facebook etc.) is a thing of the past for so many. It's become a numbers game. People moaning about getting 300 replies but most of them useless ("Job boards are dying" is the cry!). The crazy notion that social media will somehow be the silver bullet, the fix all solution - even though the same bland content is invariably been placed on there rather than on a job board or on a media owned recruitment advertising portal such as a newspaper or trade magazine.
Fact is, whatever you advertise, the message is always key. That and the right targeting. Without one or the other you will always be left with the impression there is a shortage of talent. Truth is, many recruiters don't know how to target and speak to that talent in an appealing way. They're not appealing to the emotions of the reader. They are just going through the motions. And so it will go on!
Posted by Alconcalcia | October 25, 2012 12:36 PM
Posted on October 25, 2012 12:36