EAT decisions conflict on need for reduction in headcount to create redundancy situation

twittersymbol.png

We round up what caught Tribunal Watch's eye on Twitter in the week beginning 16 July 2012, including the seemingly contradictory EAT decisions in Welch v Taxi Owners Association (Grangemouth) Ltd (on the BAILII website) and Packman t/a Packman Lucas Associates v Fauchon on whether or not a reduction in headcount is strictly necessary for there to be a redundancy situation.

Categories:

Tags:

Stephen Simpson Posted by Stephen Simpson
on July 20, 2012 5:00 PM 		| | TrackBacks (0)

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.xperthr.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/221969

Tribunal Resources

XpertHR provides summaries of and practical tips from recent employment tribunal rulings, as well as the full transcripts of the decisions.

Up-to-the-minute news on key cases that have not yet been reported elsewhere on XpertHR.

Our cases database provides unmatched coverage of precedent-setting cases from the Employment Appeal Tribunal and appellate courts.

XpertHR


XpertHR USA


Other XpertHR Blogs



HR calendar