<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Pay Intelligence</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2010-06-18:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356</id>
    <updated>2012-02-01T05:52:02Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.37</generator>

<entry>
    <title>XpertHR economic commentary February 2012: Squeezed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/02/xperthr-economic-commentary-february-2012-squeezed.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.221186</id>

    <published>2012-02-01T00:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-01T05:52:02Z</updated>

    <summary>XpertHR&apos;s February 2012 economic commentary examines current threats to UK economic recovery, including the ongoing income squeeze.One month into 2012, and the UK economy finds itself back in negative territory.Economic uncertainty is widespread, which in turn makes recovery ever more...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Carty</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<a title="By Niklas Morberg [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AJuicy_Salif_-_78365.jpg"><img alt="Juicy Salif - 78365" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/Juicy_Salif_-_78365.jpg/256px-Juicy_Salif_-_78365.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" width="256" /></a><b>XpertHR's February 2012 economic commentary examines current threats to UK economic recovery, including the ongoing income squeeze.</b><br /><br />One month into 2012, and the UK economy finds itself <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/gdp-data-25-january-2012.html">back in negative territory</a>.<br /><br />Economic uncertainty is widespread, which in turn makes recovery ever more difficult.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/research-and-intelligence/deloitte-research-uk/the-deloitte-cfo-survey/4de220fe854a4310VgnVCM1000001a56f00aRCRD.htm">"Uncertainty is [a] significant risk,"</a> according to a survey of CFOs by Deloitte. It finds that "56% of CFOs rate the level of uncertainty facing their business as being 'high' or 'very high.' As one respondent put it, 'Everyone is waiting for something very bad to happen.'" Respondents to the Deloitte survey also see a 54% chance of a double-dip recession for the UK. <br /><br />The Guardian's Larry Elliott identifies a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2011/dec/23/low-bond-yields-economic-weakness">"triple whammy"</a> of factors making UK economic recovery problematic: "falling real incomes, austerity and the crisis in the eurozone" <br /><br />XpertHR's economic commentary for February 2012 looks in detail at the impact of each of these factors, and rounds up the latest data on key economic indicators of relevance to HR professionals and reward practitioners.<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[<b>The UK's ongoing income squeeze<br /></b>Let's start with falling real incomes.<br /><br />An
 <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/quarterlybulletin/qb110402.pdf">ongoing "income squeeze"</a> is affecting UK households. This is according 
to a Bank of England survey of 1,985 UK households conducted in 
September 2011 by NMG Consulting.<br /><br />The
 research shows that a majority of UK households experienced an "income 
squeeze" over the year to September 2011. The outlook for incomes in 
2012 is "uncertain" as economic austerity measures take hold.<br /><br />Across
 the survey sample, the average pre-tax household income was £2,850 per 
month. The average monthly 'available' income (defined as disposable 
income after tax, national insurance and housing costs) for UK 
households was £720 per month. Available income had fallen over the 
preceding year by £46 per month.<br /><br />The Bank of England identifies 
three key factors contributing to the income squeeze: the January 2011 
VAT hike; rising energy and import prices; and economic austerity 
measures.<br /><br />Read the complete findings of the Bank of England research <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/quarterlybulletin/qb110402.pdf">here</a>.<br /><br /><b>Will the income squeeze ease off in 2012?</b><br />So how likely is it that the "income squeeze" might ease off in 2012?<br /><br />Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) member Ben Broadbent argues that there could be <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-24023304-mpcs-broadbent-euro-crisis-threatens-business-lending.do">reason for some (cautious) optimism</a>. He says that a number of the factors identified as contributing to the squeeze on household incomes are expected to ease over the coming months:<br /><blockquote>We would be wrong to paint only a gloomy picture. We have had a couple of really big hits to household income over the last two years. Between them, VAT and commodity prices might have taken 2.5% out of household incomes, and we're not going to have those again. VAT is not going up again and petrol and oil prices look pretty stable. That's a big effect which will add to real household income.<br /></blockquote>It should also be noted that a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/household-bills/9013894/Energy-prices-cut-at-last.html">number of energy providers have recently cut some of their prices</a>, which may in turn ease some of the burden on many UK households.<br /><br /><b>Higher pay awards for private sector workers in 2012 'a real prospect'</b><br />After a comparatively subdued 2011, private sector pay awards are showing <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/pay-rises-highest-for-three-years.html">some promising signs of growth in 2012</a>, according to latest readings from the XpertHR pay databank.<br /><br />XpertHR Pay and Benefits Editor Sheila Attwood reports that preliminary analysis of January 2012 pay awards for private sector workers suggests that "for many private sector workers, pay rises higher than the levels seen in 2011 are a real prospect." She says:<br /><blockquote>Pay rises effective in January 2012 - exclusively in the private sector due to a lack of public sector bargaining at this time of year - are worth a median 2.8%.<br /></blockquote>XpertHR will publish its analysis of whole economy pay trends over the three months to 31 January 2012 on Friday 24 February 2012.<br /><br /><b>UK economy shrank by 0.2% in Q4 2011<br /></b>The
 UK economy has lapsed <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/gdp-data-25-january-2012.html">back into negative territory</a>,
 with gross domestic product (GDP) contracting by 0.2% in the 
fourth quarter of 2011. This is according to <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_254088.pdf">latest GDP estimates</a> published by the Office
 for National Statistics (ONS) last week (on Wednesday 25 January 2012).
 <br /><br />This lapse into negative growth means that a double-dip recession is possible. But it is not necessarily inevitable:<br /><ul><li>It is possible that estimates of GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 
2011 will be revised upwards in subsequent data releases, taking it back
 into positive territory.</li><li>As we recently noted, growth 
in the second and third quarters of 2012 could also be boosted by an 
<a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/economic-prospects-for-2012-wi.html">"Olympic bounce."</a><br /></li></ul><b>Prospects for economic recovery: Is flat the new growth?</b><br />Double-dip
 recession remains a concern, but many commentators believe it could yet
 be avoided, and that GDP growth at or around nil is a more likely 
scenario. For example, Sunday Times Economics Editor <a href="http://www.economicsuk.com/blog/001571.html#more">David Smith says</a> we
 might "have to get used to the idea of flat being the new growth." He notes that the UK's lapse back into negative territory could <a href="http://www.economicsuk.com/blog/001586.html">hit already-faltering consumer confidence hard</a>.<br /><br />Here is a round-up of expert GDP forecasts published over the past month.<br /><ul><li>"We believe UK GDP will stagnate overall until mid-2012, with one 
quarter very likely in negative territory," says <b>British Chambers of 
Commerce (BCC)</b> Chief Economist <a href="http://www.britishchambers.org.uk/zones/policy/press-releases_1/bcc-s-quarterly-economic-survey-points-to-short-term-stagnation.html">David Kern</a>. But BCC Director General John Longworth notes that "a new recession is not a foregone conclusion."</li><li>The <b>EEF</b> expects <a href="http://www.eef.org.uk/blog/file.axd?file=2012%2f1%2fEcon2012+Jan.pdf">1% GDP growth in 2012</a>. 
However, "the downside risks to growth are even more marked" than at the
 start of 2011.</li><li>The <b>Ernst &amp; Young ITEM Club</b> forecasts 
that UK <a href="http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Economic_outlook_Winter_2012/$FILE/EY_ITEM_Economic_Outlook_Winter_2012.pdf">GDP will run at 0.2% in 2012</a>, rising to 1.8% in 2013 and 2.8% in
 2014.
 It says that the UK economy is "likely to remain stalled until the 
second half of [2012,] when falling inflation should provide a platform 
for a consumer recovery," and that "a serious double dip" is not 
envisaged. However, it also cautions that even this "optimistic 
assumption" presupposes a speedy and successful resolution to pressing 
economic problems in the eurozone, China, and other territories.</li><li>The <b>IMF</b> has <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2012/NEW012412A.htm">slashed its forecast for UK GDP growth</a> in 2012 from 1.6% to
 0.6%.
 It predicts a "mild recession" for the eurozone ,with GDP expected to 
contract by 0.5% in 2012. IMF Economic Counsellor Olivier Blanchard 
says: "The outlook for growth is mediocre. [...] The world recovery, which
 was weak in the first place, is in danger of stalling. The epicentre of
 the danger is Europe, but the rest of the world is increasingly 
affected."<br /></li></ul>For more on latest expert GDP forecasts, click <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/gdp-forecasts-round-up-january.html">here</a>.<br /><br /><b>Inflation: Second anniversary for above-target inflation<br />
<a title="By BRAUN AND HOGENBERG (CIVITATES ORBIS TERRARUM) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AThe_position_of_the_city_of_Hormuz_set_on_the_strait_at_the_bottom_of_the_Arabian_Gulf-1572.jpg"><img alt="The position of the city of Hormuz set on the strait at the bottom of the Arabian Gulf-1572" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/The_position_of_the_city_of_Hormuz_set_on_the_strait_at_the_bottom_of_the_Arabian_Gulf-1572.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" width="512" /></a></b>Inflation
 appears to have embarked on a downward path, but remains elevated. 
Indeed, the <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/cpi/consumer-price-indices/december-2011/index.html">latest official inflation data release</a> from ONS
 brought news of the second anniversary of above-target inflation:<br /><ul><li><b>Consumer prices index (CPI) inflation</b> fell back to 4.2% in December 
2011 (down 0.6 percentage points from 4.8% in November). Despite this 
fall, CPI has now notched up its second anniversary of coming in 
consistently above the Government's 2% inflation target rate, just as it
 has for each successive month since December 2009.</li><li><b>Retail 
prices index (RPI) inflation</b> dropped to 4.8% in December 2011, a fall of
 0.4 percentage points from the previous month's figure (5.2%).<br /></li></ul>At
 present, the consensus view among economic commentators is that 
inflation will continue to fall back throughout 2012. For example:<br /><ul><li>The <b>EEF </b>expects <a href="http://www.eef.org.uk/blog/file.axd?file=2012%2f1%2fEcon2012+Jan.pdf">CPI inflation to hit its 2% target rate</a> in August 2012.<br /></li><li>The <b>Ernst &amp; Young ITEM Club</b> says "falling inflation should provide a
 platform for a consumer recovery" in the second half of 2012. It 
expects <a href="http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Economic_outlook_Winter_2012/$FILE/EY_ITEM_Economic_Outlook_Winter_2012.pdf">CPI to average 2.3% in 2012</a>, slowing further to 1.9% in 2013.<br /></li></ul>However,
 the story of inflation in 2012 may not prove this straightforward. 
Falling inflation could cause problems of its own. And it is also 
possible that a spike in oil prices could apply new upward pressure to 
inflation. The Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2012/jan/17/inflation-squeezing-easing">sums up this situation</a>:<br /><blockquote>[I]it may be 
that by the end of 2012, it's deflation, not inflation we'll be worrying
 about - though if Iran carries out its threat to close the strait of 
Hormuz, and choke off oil supplies to the west, all bets are off."<br /></blockquote><a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/01/oil-prices?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/notthatagain">The
 Economist</a> notes
 that "some 20% of world oil production passes" through the strait of 
Hormuz, and that "supply disruptions of that magnitude in the past were 
associated with oil price increases of between 25% and 70% - and with 
American recessions."<br /><br /><b>Eurozone crisis intensifies further</b><br />
<a title="See page for author [CC0 (creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AWhen_Greece_falls.jpg"><img alt="When Greece falls" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/When_Greece_falls.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" width="256" /></a>Even the "glimmer of hope" offered by falling inflation is contingent on a 
successful resolution of the eurozone crisis (as an <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/45dbd476-352b-11e1-84b9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1iNI1VxHB">FT survey of leading
 economists</a> points out).<br /><br />The ongoing crisis in the eurozone is the second factor in the "triple whammy" facing the UK economy.<br /><br />The past month has seen the crisis intensify further:<br /><ul><li>The credit agencies have downgraded many eurozone countries (see the 
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/30/credit-ratings-country-fitch-moodys-standard">Guardian's helpful overview</a>).
 Standard &amp; Poor's has also <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9019093/Eurozones-big-bazooka-bail-out-fund-is-left-in-tatters-by-SandP-downgrade.html">downgraded the European Financial 
Stability Fund</a>
 (the EFSF; the eurozone's "big bazooka" bailout fund).</li><li>Concerns are emerging that a double-dip recession is possible for many 
eurozone countries. The <b><a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/update/01/index.htm">IMF World Economic Outlook</a></b> report says that "the
 global recovery is threatened by intensifying strains in the euro area 
and fragilities elsewhere." The 
IMF says "the euro area economy is now expected to go into a mild 
recession in 2012." It has slashed its global GDP growth forecast for 
2012 from 4% to 3.3%</li><li>The draft euro-plus treaty "sets up a 
framework and a timetable for the evolution of European economic policy 
as mediated by EU institutions that, if not substantially amended, all 
but guarantees Britain's departure from the Union [by 2017]." This is 
according to <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2012/01/european-union-treaty-britain">New Statesman blogger Rafael Behr</a>.<br /></li></ul>At the start of this week, William Hague warned that the eurozone crisis is having a <a href="https://twitter.com/BBCNews/statuses/163900959687323648">"chilling effect"</a> on the UK economy. Yet some
 commentators remain convinced that the eurozone crisis can and will be 
resolved relatively quickly. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9017364/Eurozone-debt-crisis-likely-to-be-over-soon-predicts-HSBC.html">HSBC Chairman Douglas Flint</a> believes 
European leaders will take "firm action" to resolve crisis by second 
half of 2012:<br /><blockquote>It
 would be naive to think that this can be solved within weeks, but my 
view is that it will be a reasonably short timeframe, certainly by 
second half [of 2012].<br /></blockquote>A <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16803157">fiscal treaty designed to help enforce budget discipline</a> has now been signed by 25 of the 27 EU member states (with only the UK and the Czech Republic opting out), the BBC reports. It remains to be seen if this will mark a turning point in the eurozone crisis.<br /><br /><b>The impact of austerity measures on economic recovery</b><br />The impact of economic austerity measures on economic growth is the third factor in the "triple whammy" facing the economy.<br /><br />A number of official bodies have issued warnings on the potential impact of austerity on growth:<br /><ul><li><a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/quarterlybulletin/qb110402.pdf">Economic austerity is likely to produce further uncertainty</a>
 as 2012 unfolds, <b>Bank of England</b> research suggests. Nearly half of UK 
households (48%) surveyed say they have been affected by austerity 
measures over the past year. But looking ahead, more than two-thirds of 
UK households (69%) expect austerity to affect them over the coming 
year. The three main expected effects of austerity are: higher taxes 
(cited by 32% of respondents), lower income (24%) and less spending on 
services used (20%). Fear of job loss is also prevalent, and rises 
sharply in households "that were reliant on the public sector for more 
than half of their income," to around one in three.</li><li><b>IMF 
</b>Fiscal Affairs Department Head <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2012/NEW012412A.htm">Carlo Cottarelli says</a>: "The pace of 
fiscal consolidation in advanced economies in 2012 is already high. Too 
rapid consolidation, if economic growth slows, could exacerbate risks."</li><li>The <b><a href="http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_171571.pdf">ILO</a></b> says: "Recently
 observed cuts in labour market spending, such as reduced support for 
programmes for young jobseekers in the United Kingdom, are likely to 
come with substantial long-term adverse consequences for labour market 
prospects."</li><li>"Expansionary contraction is oxymoronic although I don't think you 
actually need the prefix oxy." This is according to Harvard professor <b><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/davos/9041442/Davos-2012-Prudential-chief-Tidjane-Thiam-says-minimum-wage-is-a-machine-to-destroy-jobs.html">Larry Summers</a></b>, speaking at last month's World Economic Forum in Davos.</li></ul>However, it is unlikely that Chancellor George 
Osborne will announce any rethink of austerity measures when he delivers
 his <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/12/budget-2012-osborne-to-deliver.html">Budget 2012</a> speech next month (on Wednesday 21 March 2012).<br /><br />Osborne
 once again <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9017364/Eurozone-debt-crisis-likely-to-be-over-soon-predicts-HSBC.html">reaffirmed his faith in austerity measures</a> in a speech to 
the Asian Financial Forum in Hong Kong in January 2012:<br /><blockquote>[G]lobal
 confidence in a country depends on its determination to deal decisively
 with the challenges it faces - and by getting to grip with our debts, 
Britain has shown it is determined to do that.<br /></blockquote><b>Unemployment rate hits highest level since November 1995</b><br />Economic austerity measures appear to be having a direct impact on unemployment.<br /><br />The
 first unemployment data release of 2012 shows the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/unemployment-data-january-2012.html">failure of the 
private sector to create new jobs to fill the gaps</a> resulting from public
 sector job cuts.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/unemployment-data-january-2012.html">Unemployment continues to climb</a> across a number of measures:<br /><ul><li>The <b>headline unemployment rate</b> (on the ILO definition) hit 8.4% between
 September and November 2011, its highest rate since November 1995.</li><li>The <b>number of unemployed people</b> rose to 2.68 million, an increase of 118,000.</li><li><b>Youth unemployment</b> once again hit a record high, rising to 22.3% over the three months to November 2011.</li><li>The <b>number of people "working part-time because they could not find a 
full-time job"</b> also hit a record high of 1.31 million.<br /></li></ul>Economic commentators are united in expecting labour market conditions to worsen throughout 2012:<br /><ul><li>"The number of unemployed looks set to hit the three million mark this 
year, as the economy heads back into recession," says economist<b> <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-blanchflower/2012/01/employment-increase-unemployed">David 
Blanchflower</a>.</b><br /></li><li>The<b> <a href="http://www.britishchambers.org.uk/zones/policy/press-releases_1/bcc-s-quarterly-economic-survey-points-to-short-term-stagnation.html">British Chambers of Commerce (BCC)</a></b> says: "We are predicting an 
increase in the UK jobless total to 2.77 million by the end of 2012."</li><li>Latest <b>DWP</b> projections suggest that "an extra 750,000 people will join the ranks of the long-term unemployed over the next four years," the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jan/31/long-term-unemployment-leap-forecast">Guardian reports</a>. It says the DWP forecasts "show an increase of 32% from 2.4 million to 3.3 million in the number of people expected to be entered into the Work Programme - the government's flagship project for finding work for those who are typically out of work for longer than 9-12 months."<br /></li><li>The <b><a href="http://www.eef.org.uk/blog/file.axd?file=2012%2f1%2fEcon2012+Jan.pdf">EEF</a> </b>expects the ILO unemployment rate to run at 8.6% over 
2012. &nbsp;&nbsp; <br /></li><li>The <a href="http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Economic_outlook_Winter_2012/$FILE/EY_ITEM_Economic_Outlook_Winter_2012.pdf"><b>Ernst &amp; Young ITEM Club</b></a> expects unemployment to "peak in the 
first half of 2013 at almost 3 million, 9.3% of the labour force, before
 beginning to fall back." <br /></li><li>"Long-term uncertainties over the state of the economy will 
force employers to put at least some of their hiring strategies on hold,
 and to think harder before employing new staff; a situation that will 
force significant changes in the behaviour of job seekers in the year 
ahead."
 This is according to the latest Quarterly Recruitment Review from <a href="http://www.jobsite.co.uk/downloads/research/Online_Recruitment_Quarterly_Market_Tracker_Winter_2011.pdf"><b>Jobsite</b></a>.<br /></li></ul><b>How much more quantitative easing can we expect in 2012?</b><br />
<a title="By Adrian Pingstone [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABank.of.england.arp.750pix.jpg"><img alt="Bank.of.england.arp.750pix" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/Bank.of.england.arp.750pix.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" width="200" /></a>With the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/gdp-data-25-january-2012.html">economy back in negative territory</a>,
 many commentators expect to see an extension to the <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/assetpurchases.htm">UK's programme of 
quantitative easing</a> in 
the near future, in order to attempt to boost growth.<br /><br />New 
quantitative easing could come as soon as midday on Thursday 9 February 
2012, when the results of the MPC's February 2012 meeting are announced.
 <br /><br />For example, the <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-24028377-inflation-fall-expected-following-supermarket-price-war.do">Evening Standard
 says</a> that "a February return to the printing presses by the Bank of 
England look[s] all but certain," following the news of falling 
inflation.<br /><br />There is also speculation that the MPC could be 
considering other measures to boost growth, such as improving credit 
flow to businesses.<br /><br />So how much additional quantitative easing might we expect?<br /><br />The
 BBC's <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16529313">Stephanie Flanders notes</a> that "many economists expect a further 
£50 billion-plus of quantitative easing once the current programme is 
complete." This would 
increase the total value of the Bank of England's <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/news/2012/001.htm">"asset purchases 
financed by the issuance of central bank reserves"</a> to £325 
billion.<br /><br />Flanders cautions that we could soon reach <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16538773">"the 
technical limits of quantitative easing."</a> This is "the practical 
question of when and whether the Bank will run out of Government bonds 
to buy." She says: <br /><blockquote>[T]he Bank has set itself fairly clear 
limits on the kind of bonds it will buy, and how much. If the MPC is 
still worrying about deflation and recession a year from now, those 
limits could well start to bind. [... HSBC research suggests that] the 
MPC has significantly less than £500 billion in government bonds 
available for quantitative easing in 2012, £275bn of which it has 
already bought, or is committed to buying in the next few weeks. And 
that is the absolute limit.<br /></blockquote>So there is a ceiling on quantitative easing.<br /><br />Even the Bank of England could be feeling the squeeze before 2012 is out.<br />
<ul><li><b><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/02/pay-bargaining-statistics-february-2012.html">Key bargaining statistics on pay, prices and employment for February 2012</a></b> </li></ul>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pay bargaining statistics: February 2012</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/02/pay-bargaining-statistics-february-2012.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.218749</id>

    <published>2012-02-01T00:00:01Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-01T05:26:30Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[We present the February 2012 XpertHR Salary Surveys pay bargaining statistics table, which provides the latest monthly&nbsp;summary of&nbsp;key data for pay specialists. XpertHR Salary Surveys economic commentary for February 2012XpertHR Salary Surveys economic commentaries and pay bargaining statistics for earlier...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Carty</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Pay bargaining stats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="cpi" label="cpi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="employment" label="employment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="inflation" label="inflation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payawards" label="pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rpi" label="rpi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="unemployment" label="unemployment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<p>We present the February 2012 XpertHR Salary Surveys pay bargaining 
statistics table, which provides the latest monthly&nbsp;summary of&nbsp;key data 
for pay specialists. </p>
<ul><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/02/xperthr-economic-commentary-february-2012-squeezed.html">XpertHR Salary Surveys economic commentary for February 2012</a><br /></li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/economics/">XpertHR Salary Surveys economic commentaries and pay bargaining statistics for earlier months</a>.</li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/paybenefits/default.aspx">Further data on pay and other labour market measures at XpertHR</a>.</li></ul> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<table width="520" bgcolor="#ffffff" border="1" bordercolor="#999999" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top" align="left"><strong><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">XpertHR Salary Surveys pay bargaining statistics: February 2012</font></strong></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><strong>Measure</strong></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><strong>How calculated</strong></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><strong>Latest</strong></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><strong>INFLATION</strong></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Retail Prices Index (RPI) </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">% change over 12 months </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dec 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">4.8%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Consumer Prices Index (CPI) </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">% change over 12 months </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dec 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">4.2%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><strong>BASIC PAY SETTLEMENTS </strong></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Whole economy - median</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annual awards over three months </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dec 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">2.5%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Whole economy - upper quartile</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annual awards over three months </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dec 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">3.0%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Whole economy - lower quartile </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annual awards over three months </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dec 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">1.6%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><strong>EMPLOYMENT</strong></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><br /></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Unemployment </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ILO measure: jobless and seeking work </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nov 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">2.68 million</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Redundancies </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of redundancies, 3 months to </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dec 11<br /></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">164,000</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vacancies</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of vacancies, 3 months to </td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dec 11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<div align="center">463,000</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top" align="left">
<p>Sources: Inflation: <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Price+Indices+and+Inflation" target="_blank">ONS</a>; Pay settlements: <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/paybenefits/default.aspx" target="_blank">XpertHR pay databank</a>; Employment: <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Employment" target="_blank">ONS</a>. </p></td></tr></tbody></table>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Public service pension reforms &quot;unlikely to save money&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/public-service-pension-reforms-unlikely-to-save-money.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.221394</id>

    <published>2012-01-31T11:23:52Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-31T12:57:23Z</updated>

    <summary>The public service pension reforms currently being negotiated will make &quot;little or no difference to the long-term costs&quot;, according to analysis by researchers at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). Discussions over the reform of public service pensions have been...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Rachel Sharp</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Pensions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="pensionspublicsector" label="pensions; public sector" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[The public service pension reforms currently being negotiated will make "little or no difference to the long-term costs", according to <a href="http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/5999">analysis by researchers at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)</a>. Discussions over the reform of public service pensions have been protracted and difficult, and have resulted in two days of industrial action. The IFS report finds that savings made as a result of increasing the age at which employees can take their pension are, on average, offset by changes to other elements.<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[Far more significant in terms of savings is the decision to uprate 
public service pensions by the consumer prices index (CPI) rather than 
the retail prices index (RPI), announced by the coalition Government in 
the October 2010 Spending Review, which - together with reform to the 
schemes introduced under the previous Labour Government - "will 
significantly reduce the generosity of these pensions for many public 
sector workers". The move to change the method of indexation is the 
subject of ongoing challenge in the courts. <br />
<br />
The IFS concludes that, in general, lower earners in the public sector 
will get a more generous pension as a result of the proposed reforms, 
although higher earners are likely to lose out in the move from 
final-salary to career-average schemes. This will have the effect of 
increasing the differential between the public and private sectors, as 
it is the lowest paid in the private sector who are least likely to have
 good occupational pension provision.<br />&nbsp;<br />
Responding to the IFS findings, TUC general secretary Brendan Barber 
said: "This report examines only one of the three major changes to 
public sector pensions. As its analysis concedes, the switch to CPI 
indexation has had a huge impact on future pensions. Similarly the big 
increase in contributions immediately reduces the cost of public sector 
pensions by taking a big chunk out of most public servants' pay.<br /><br />
"The IFS draws its conclusions only from changes in scheme design, where
 union negotiators - aided by the great support for the TUC's day of 
action on November 30 - were able to win concessions. But if you take 
the package as a whole there can be no doubt that many public sector 
workers may have to pay more, work longer and get a pension that will 
not keep up with the proper measure of the cost of living."<br /><br /><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:DocumentProperties>
  <o:Author>Carl Emmerson</o:Author>
  <o:Version>11.8107</o:Version>
 </o:DocumentProperties>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:View>Normal</w:View>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:SnapToGridInCell/>
   <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
   <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
  </w:Compatibility>
  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->

<p class="MsoNormal">On the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 on 31 January 2012, the
Treasury described the IFS analysis as "partial and misleading" and
said reforms to public service pensions would save the taxpayer "tens of
billions of pounds over the next few decades".</p>


]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Police officer pay and pensions changes confirmed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/police-officer-pay-and-pensions-changes-confirmed.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.221321</id>

    <published>2012-01-30T12:51:32Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-01T10:38:23Z</updated>

    <summary>The award of the Police Arbitration Tribunal (PAT) on a package of reforms to police officer pay and conditions in England and Wales has been accepted in full by Home Secretary Theresa May, it was announced today (30 January 2012)....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Rachel Sharp</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Public sector pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="pensions" label="pensions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="police" label="police" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="publicsector" label="public sector" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="winsorreview" label="Winsor review" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/increment-freeze-for-police-officers-upheld-by-police-arbitration-tribunal.html?cp=NLC-PTNRB20120127&amp;attr=editorial">award of the Police Arbitration Tribunal (PAT)</a> on a package of reforms to police officer pay and conditions in England and Wales has been accepted in full by Home Secretary Theresa May, it was announced today (30 January 2012). <br /><br />The PAT had been asked to consider the recommendations of the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/03/police-pay-review-2011-suspend-pay-progression-and-cut-overtime-costs-1.html">first part of the Winsor review of police pay and conditions</a> after the Police Negotiating Board failed to reach agreement on the proposed changes. Although the tribunal accepted 10 of Winsor's recommendations, it modified five. The home secretary's decision means that police officers will see pay progression frozen for two years in addition to a two-year basic pay freeze. May described the reforms as "an important first step in modifying police pay and conditions so that they are fair to officers and to taxpayers", and confirmed that the Government was committed to further reform. The second part of the Winsor review, which looks at longer-term changes to police pay, is expected shortly. Several of the recommendations of the first part of the review have been deferred until the second part is published.<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[May also confirmed that increases to police officer pension contribution rates will 
be implemented from April 2012 in line with Government proposals put 
forward in July 2011 as part of its <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/111741/public-sector-pay-2011--pay-freeze-sets-in.aspx?#21">reform of public service pensions</a> [£].
 The Police Negotiating Board will be asked to consider the proposed 
increases for 2013/14 and 2014/15.<br /><br />
Responding to the announcement that the PAT's ruling had been accepted, 
the lead on workforce development for the Association of Chief Police 
Officers (ACPO), Chief Constable Peter Fahy, said: <br /><blockquote>"Overall, the decisions 
strike a balance between the need to achieve savings given the national 
economic situation and the financial pressures facing individual police 
officers.<br />&nbsp;<br />
"The two-year pay freeze combined with a two-year increment freeze, the 
removal of various bonus payments and the increase in pension 
contributions will have a significant impact on many staff. It is right 
that those working unsocial hours should receive an additional payment. <br /><br />
"Over time ACPO would like to see a greater emphasis on recognising the 
considerable expertise of our staff in the pay system and a lesser 
importance on time served. We will hopefully be able to address some of 
these issues in the next stage of the Winsor report."<br /></blockquote>
Paul McKeever, chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales, 
said: <br /><blockquote>"We are pleased that the home secretary has honoured the Police 
Negotiating Board (PNB) process and will ratify the decision of the 
Police Arbitration Tribunal. <br /><br />
"However, whilst we accept that the decision of the PAT is binding on 
both sides of PNB, it does not mean that we're happy with the outcome. 
Whichever way you dress it up, this will mean serious financial hardship
 for police officers. <br /><br />
"In addition to what amounts to a four-year public sector pay freeze and
 increased pension contributions, police officers are having to contend 
with a range of changes to terms and conditions; the result of which is 
effectively a pay cut. <br /><br />
"The imposition of the pension increase is disappointing. Police 
officers not only have no industrial rights; on the issues of pensions 
they have no right to negotiate."<br /><br /></blockquote><b>UPDATE:</b> Following the home secretary's decision, it was announced that the publication of the second part of the Winsor review, which had been expected in January 2012, would be subject to "a short delay".<br />
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The national minimum wage: &apos;A machine to destroy jobs&apos;?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/the-national-minimum-wage-a-machine-to-destroy-jobs.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.221232</id>

    <published>2012-01-27T08:25:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-27T11:28:38Z</updated>

    <summary> &quot;The minimum wage is a machine to destroy jobs.&quot; This is according to Prudential Chief Executive Tidjane Thiam, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, yesterday (Thursday 26 January 2012). Thiam argued that the national minimum wage is...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Carty</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<a title="By World Economic Forum from Cologny, Switzerland [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATidjane_Thiam_-_Annual_Meeting_of_the_New_Champions_2011.jpg"><img alt="Tidjane Thiam - Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2011" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1f/Tidjane_Thiam_-_Annual_Meeting_of_the_New_Champions_2011.jpg/512px-Tidjane_Thiam_-_Annual_Meeting_of_the_New_Champions_2011.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" width="530" /></a>

"The minimum wage is a machine to destroy jobs." This is according to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/davos/9041442/Davos-2012-Prudential-chief-Tidjane-Thiam-says-minimum-wage-is-a-machine-to-destroy-jobs.html">Prudential Chief Executive Tidjane Thiam</a>, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, yesterday (Thursday 26 January 2012). Thiam argued that the national minimum wage is a "false social policy" designed to protect workers, but which serves to prevent the unemployed from finding work.<br /><b><br />National minimum wage: Crowding out the unemployed?</b><br />According to the Daily Telegraph, Thiam said:<br /><blockquote>The minimum wage is a machine to destroy jobs. Look at France and Le Pen. The minimum wage is the enemy of young people entering the labour market. They don't have a voice. [...] Unions represent people already in jobs so they always support minimum wages. That crowds out the unemployed. People can't get full time employment. They move from fixed-term contract to fixed-term contract.<br /></blockquote>Thiam's comments come in the run-up to the announcement of the national minimum wage increase for 2012/2013, which will come into effect from Monday 1 October 2012.<br /><br /><b>What can we expect from the October 2012 national minimum wage increase?</b><br />Given the current backdrop of ongoing economic uncertainty, subdued pay awards, rising unemployment and falling inflation, news of the annual increase to the national minimum wage for 2012/2013 (due to come into effect on Monday 1 October 2012) will be particularly closely watched. <br /><br />The Low Pay Commission (LPC) is scheduled to deliver its 2012 report - which will set out its recommendations for the 2012/2013 national minimum wage rates - to the Government by the end of February 2012.<br /><br />The Government will then announce the national minimum wage rates for 2012/2013 a few weeks later, although we do not yet know if this will form part of Chancellor George Osborne's <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/12/budget-2012-osborne-to-deliver.html">Budget 2012</a> speech on Wednesday 21 March 2012.<br /><br />As XpertHR notes, it is <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/111535/national-minimum-wage-may-rise.aspx">not a foregone conclusion</a> that we will see any increase to the national minimum wage in 2012/2013.<br /><br />The Telegraph's Head of Business <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/damianreece/9042652/A-minimum-wage-can-be-beneficial-...-as-long-as-its-set-at-the-right-level.html">Damian Reece argues</a> that "the [national] minimum wage [must be] set at an appropriate level," and suggests that "a helpful start to minimum wage reform might be a moratorium on any further rises, at least for another two years."<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<br />XpertHR will of course keep you updated as to further developments regarding the national minimum wage rates for 2012/2013.<br /><br /><b>UPDATE 1 (Friday 27 January 2012):</b><br />The issues raised in this post have received a number of interesting responses via social media:<br /><ul><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2012/01/is-the-national-minimum-wage-a.html#comment-18098901">Simon Jones comments</a>: "It's slightly concerning that the leader of a major business does not understand simple economics. Driving down wages drives down spending power and thus reduces demand for goods and services. It also treats labour simply as a commodity that can be picked up and put down as and when required - exactly the sort of behaviour that will disillusion young people and is more likely than the minimum wage, in my view, to drive them into the arms of extremists."</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/pcsavage/statuses/162857412351623168">@pcsavage says</a> (via Twitter): Not having a minimum wage would just nationalise the problem. Low pay = benefits = paid by taxpayer not employer</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/deniswbarnard">@deniswbarnard</a> says (via Twitter): Problem is costs not wages. Fixed costs of living in the UK (utilities, petrol, taxes) untenable. Add in inflation: ker-boom! We are paying more and more for less and less. Exactly what value does the Community charge deliver nowadays?<br /></li></ul><b>See also:<br /></b><ul><li><b><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/10/the-future-of-the-national-min.html">National
 minimum wage 2012/2013: What can we expect from the October 2012 
national minimum wage increase?</a></b>
 We look at what might be expected from the national minimum wage 
increase for 2012/2013. This post will be kept updated as new 
information emerges on what we might expect from the national minimum 
wage in 2012/2013.</li><li><a href="http://change-effect.com/2011/10/03/how-little-are-you-worth-pay-the-economy-and-a-living-wage/"><b>How little are you worth? Pay, the economy and a living wage</b></a>
UK HR blogger Neil Morrison responds to claims from the 
Institute of Economic Affairs that the national minimum wage might be 
stifling job creation.</li><li><a href="http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/DG_177940"><b>Pay and Work Rights Helpline contact details</b></a>
 On the Directgov website. Directgov says: "The Pay and Work Rights 
Helpline gives confidential help and advice on the NMW and can handle 
calls in over 100 languages. If you aren't being paid the NMW you can 
contact the Pay and Work Rights helpline or use the online enquiry or 
complaint form."</li><li><a href="http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/Employees/TheNationalMinimumWage/DG_10037277"><b>Calculating the National Minimum Wage: How to check your pay</b></a>
 On the Directgov website. Directgov says: "Almost all workers are 
entitled to be paid at least the National Minimum Wage (NMW). To check 
if you are being paid the NMW rate you need to know your pay reference 
period and what elements of pay count towards the NMW."</li><li><a href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/rates-thresholds.htm#2"><b>National minimum wage: Rates and thresholds for employers</b></a> Latest info from the HMRC website.</li><li><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15151877"><b>Minimum wage should be scrapped, says IEA's Littlewood</b></a> The BBC reports.<br /></li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/hr-benchmarking/survey/464/.aspx"><b>National Minimum Wage 2011</b></a>
 (XpertHR benchmarking subscription required) The XpertHR benchmarking 
survey on the national minimum wage for 2010/2011. The survey looks at 
the following: the impact of the national minimum wage; how employers 
have adjusted to the national minimum wage; and at their views on the 
statutory pay floor.</li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/viewarticle.aspx?id=109388"><b>International minimum wage update 2011</b></a>
 (Subscription required) Twenty out of 27 EU member states have a 
national minimum wage. In January 2011, according to the latest Eurostat
 data, monthly minimum wage rates ranged from €1,758 in Luxembourg to 
€123 in Bulgaria - more than a 14-fold difference. At €1,139, the UK's 
minimum wage was the EU's sixth highest.</li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/21415/national-minimum-wage.aspx"><b>National minimum wage</b></a> (Subscription required) From XpertHR's statutory rates service.</li><li><a href="http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/"><b>Low Pay Commission</b></a>
 Visit the Low Pay Commission (LPC) website for further information on 
the national minimum wage for 2011/2012, and for previous years.</li><li><a href="http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/lowpay/report/pdf/Revised_Report_PDF_with_April_date.PDF"><b>Low Pay Commission 2011 Report (PDF format, 4.1 MB)</b></a>
 Download the 2011 LPC report, which sets out the LPC's complete 
research and recommendations on the 2011/2012 national minimum wage 
increase.</li><li><a href="http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/Employees/TheNationalMinimumWage/DG_10027201"><b>The National Minimum Wage rates</b></a> Complete details of current and future national minimum wage rates from the Directgov website.</li></ul>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Underwhelming&quot; proposals on curbing executive pay</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/underwhelming-proposals-on-curbing-executive-pay.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.221089</id>

    <published>2012-01-24T12:07:24Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-24T12:14:21Z</updated>

    <summary> Reaction to Vince Cable&apos;s proposals on executive pay (on the Parliament website) is mixed, with many commentators questioning whether they will lead to any difference in practice. Unions in particular had hoped that the proposals would include introducing employee...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Sheila Attwood</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Executive pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="executivepay" label="executive pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<font color="#000000"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">Reaction to Vince Cable's <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201212/cmhansrd/cm120123/debtext/120123-0001.htm#12012313000002">proposals on executive pay</a> (on the Parliament website) is mixed, with many commentators questioning whether they will lead to any difference in practice. Unions in particular had hoped that the proposals would include introducing employee representation on remuneration committees, but instead the onus remains with shareholders. The TUC said that the proposals have "spectacularly failed to make any significant changes to the status quo", while trade union Unite said the Business Secretary "lacks backbone on boardroom pay". Labour MP Chuka Umunna, who forced the Business Secretary to make his announcement a day earlier than planned, asked why the plans do not "</span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB">back moves for employees to sit on the remuneration committees that set pay?"</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="BACKGROUND: white; MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">However, some business commentators are more positive, with the Institute of Directors saying that "</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US">The Government has done the right thing in rejecting calls for the mandatory inclusion of employees on remuneration committees." CBI director-general John Cridland commented: "</span><span lang="EN" style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN; mso-fareast-language: EN-GB">Not including employees on boards makes sense. Every good company involves its staff in how the business is doing, but boards must be the representatives of business owners."<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal"></span></font></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font color="#000000">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">In his statement to the House of Commons, Cable said that "it is not the Government's role to micro-manage company pay", but that it could not accept top pay rising at five times the rate of average workers' pay. The measures to be taken forward include those to force greater transparency, and more shareholder powers.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">On greater transparency, companies will have to provide more details on executive pay, and "be expected" to detail their executive pay policies, including how these fit overall with company strategy. On greater shareholder involvement, he will launch a consultation on giving shareholders a binding vote on executive pay, as well as on notice periods and large severance packages. Other proposals include introducing more diversity onto company boards, with companies being required to report on boardroom diversity; and requiring all companies to have "clawback" policies where bonuses are no longer deemed justified.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal"></font></span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pay rises highest for three years</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/pay-rises-highest-for-three-years.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.220912</id>

    <published>2012-01-20T00:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-19T13:25:07Z</updated>

    <summary>The first analysis of pay settlements effective in 2012 reveals a marked increase in the level of awards made, according to pay specialists XpertHR. Pay rises effective in January 2012 - exclusively in the private sector due to a lack...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Sheila Attwood</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="payawards" label="pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payawardsinflation" label="pay awards; inflation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payfreeze" label="pay freeze" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payprospects" label="pay prospects" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><font size="2">The first analysis of pay settlements effective in 2012 reveals a marked increase in the level of awards made, <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/111740/.aspx">according to pay specialists XpertHR</a>.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><font size="2">Pay rises effective in January 2012 - exclusively in the private sector due to a lack of public sector bargaining at this time of year - are worth a median 2.8%. This is the highest level seen since December 2008 (when the private sector median stood at 3.7%).<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><font size="2">This is well above the 2% to 2.5% median increase seen through 2011 in the private sector, and above the 2.5% median recorded in the three months to the end of December 2011.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font color="#000000">Pay freezes continue to feature in our analysis, with our sample including six settlements where pay has been frozen. However, almost half (48.8%) of January 2012 pay deals are worth 3% or more, and 3% is the most common pay increase recorded.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font color="#000000">Manufacturing pay awards continue to outstrip those in the services sector, something that we have seen since April 2010. Among the pay awards effective in January 2012, the median pay increase in the manufacturing sector is 3%, compared with 2.5% in private sector services.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><font size="2">The pattern of higher pay awards in the first few months of the year was something we saw in 2011 - the level of pay increases fell in April 2011 when the public sector pay freezes were added to the calculations and pay awards in the service sector were low. We can again expect a flurry of public sector pay awards worth nil to be added to the data in April, but remain hopeful that private sector pay awards will maintain their upward trend.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><font size="2">The increase in pay awards is set against a marked fall in retail prices index (RPI) inflation - to 4.8% in December 2011. If the pace of decline in inflation continues, there is a real opportunity for employers to make up for years of low pay rises with an increase this year that is worth more than inflation.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><o:p><font size="2">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm"><font color="#000000"><b><i><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">XpertHR Pay and Benefits</span></i></b><b><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"> editor Sheila Attwood said:<o:p></o:p></span></b></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font color="#000000">"The data collected to date suggests that pay bargaining in 2012 has got off to a good start and that, for many private sector workers, pay rises higher than the levels seen in 2011 are a real prospect.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 6pt 0cm"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font color="#000000">"Over the past few months we have started to see evidence of a shift to higher pay awards than were made the year before. We now find that the majority of pay awards are at a higher or the same level as paid to the same group of employees the year before, with only a handful making lower awards."<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Regional pay riles unions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/regional-pay-riles-unions.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.220589</id>

    <published>2012-01-11T14:42:35Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-11T14:56:00Z</updated>

    <summary> Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:&quot;Table Normal&quot;; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:&quot;&quot;; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} Moving public sector workers onto regional pay has...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jo Doonar</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Public sector pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="payawards" label="pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payreviewbodies" label="pay review bodies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="publicsector" label="public sector" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="regionalpay" label="regional pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:View>Normal</w:View>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:SnapToGridInCell/>
   <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
   <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
  </w:Compatibility>
  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->

<p style="margin: 6pt 0cm; line-height: 150%;">Moving public sector workers onto regional pay has been branded by the GMB as "short changing regional economies".</p><p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:
0cm;line-height:150%">The Government proposals to introduce re<span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:150%;
font-family:Arial">gional pay were
debated at the House of Commons yesterday. According to the Government, this
will help to create a more balanced economy, but those opposed to the
proposals, such as Jonathan Edwards Plaid Cymru MP, say the proposals would
further depress areas in need of investment.</span></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:View>Normal</w:View>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:SnapToGridInCell/>
   <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
   <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
  </w:Compatibility>
  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;line-height:150%"><span style="color:windowtext;mso-bidi-font-weight:
normal">Paul Kenny, GMB General Secretary said, </span><span style="color:windowtext">"Cutting
workers' pay will not create a single job in any region and will lead to
further falls in demands for goods and services in regions facing the pay cuts
implied in this proposal.</span><span style="color:windowtext;mso-bidi-font-weight:
normal"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 6pt 0cm; line-height: 150%;"><span style="color: windowtext;">"Living
standards have already dropped by between 9.1 % and 2.3% in different regions
since the general election and these proposals will make things worse for the
ordinary working people."</span><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:View>Normal</w:View>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:SnapToGridInCell/>
   <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
   <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
  </w:Compatibility>
  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->

</p><p style="margin: 6pt 0cm; line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%; font-family: Arial; color: black;">The union PCS agreed regional or local pay rates
would "drive down wages and further depress local economies that
desperately need investment, not more cuts". It described Chancellor
George Osborne's proposal as "economically incoherent".</span></p><p style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:
0cm;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:150%;
font-family:Arial;color:black">The proposals were part of the 2011 Autumn Statement, when Osborne asked pay review bodies to "consider how public sector pay can be made more responsive to local labour markets".</span></p><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:
150%"></span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;
margin-left:0cm;line-height:150%"></p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%;
font-family:Arial"></span>

]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pay progression freeze for police officers upheld by Police Arbitration Tribunal </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/increment-freeze-for-police-officers-upheld-by-police-arbitration-tribunal.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.220477</id>

    <published>2012-01-09T17:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-30T15:31:46Z</updated>

    <summary>UPDATE 30 JANUARY 2012 The Home Secretary has confirmed that she will accept the Police Arbitration Tribunal&apos;s findings in full.A two-year freeze on pay progression for most police officers in England and Wales should go ahead by April 2012, finds...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Rachel Sharp</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Public sector pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="policepayprogressionwinsorreview" label="police; pay progression; Winsor review" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<b>UPDATE 30 JANUARY 2012</b> <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/police-officer-pay-and-pensions-changes-confirmed.html">The Home Secretary has confirmed that she will accept the Police Arbitration Tribunal's findings in full</a>.<br /><br />A two-year freeze on pay progression for most police officers in England and Wales should go ahead by April 2012, finds the Police Arbitration Tribunal (PAT), whose <a href="http://www.polfed.org/mediacenter/PAT_Winsor_one.asp">decision on the Winsor recommendations</a> (external website) was published today (9 January 2012).<br /><br />The PAT was asked to make an award on 18 recommendations of the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/03/police-pay-review-2011-suspend-pay-progression-and-cut-overtime-costs-1.html">Winsor review of police pay and conditions</a> on which the Police Negotiating Board (PNB) was unable to reach agreement. Winsor had proposed a two-year freeze on incremental progression, and the official side of the PNB had agreed to make an exception for new officers at the bottom of the pay scale. Although the PAT took the view that the first three points on the constable's scale should be excluded from the suspension, it said all other progression on the police officers' pay scales should be frozen as proposed.<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[The PAT award modifies five of the recommendations, including that on 
casual overtime. Winsor had recommended that the rate for casual 
overtime should be reduced from time and one-third to plain time, and 
the minimum hours for being recalled should be abolished and replaced 
with payment for the hours worked. The PAT accepted that the minimum 
hours should be abolished, but said that the premium rate for the hours 
worked should not be reduced. The tribunal also believes the 
recommendation to abolish competence-related threshold payments should 
be modified so that those already in receipt of the payment would retain
 it, with a two-year freeze on new applications. Overall, the PAT 
approved 10 of the recommendations. It did not make an award on a 
further three, which it felt would be more appropriately dealt with by 
the second part of the Winsor review, which is looking into long-term 
pay structures for the police and is due to be published later this 
month.<br />
<br />
Responding to the decision, Paul McKeever, chairman of the Police 
Federation of England and Wales, said:<br /><div align="left"><blockquote>&nbsp;"We are extremely disappointed 
with today's decision by the Police Arbitration Tribunal and know that 
many police officers across England and Wales will be angry and dismayed
 about their future. However, we entered in to the negotiation process 
in good faith and therefore, whilst not happy with the entire decision, 
accept their ruling. . .&nbsp; Moving forward, we will do everything in our 
power at the Police Negotiating Board to minimise the negative impact 
today's decision could have on police officers."<br /></blockquote></div>
Although the award of the PAT stands as an agreement made in the PNB, 
the final decision on whether or not to accept its findings lies with 
the home secretary. <br />
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>XpertHR economic commentary January 2012: Welcome to &apos;no-growth Britain&apos;?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/xperthr-economic-commentary-january-2012-prospects-for-the-coming-year.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.219882</id>

    <published>2012-01-01T00:03:01Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-02T08:59:37Z</updated>

    <summary>XpertHR&apos;s January 2012 economic commentary looks ahead to prospects for the coming year.As 2012 gets underway, the UK economic outlook is extremely uncertain.The UK is now well into the age of austerity. Growth is ongoing but weak, with concerns that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Carty</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/2012Graffiti-149279.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/2012Graffiti-149279.html','popup','width=389,height=187,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/2012Graffiti-thumb-250x120-149279.jpg" alt="2012Graffiti.JPG" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" width="250" /></a><b>XpertHR's January 2012 economic commentary looks ahead to prospects for the coming year.</b><br /><br />As 2012 gets underway, the UK economic outlook is extremely uncertain.<br /><br />The UK is now well into the age of austerity. Growth is ongoing but weak, with concerns that we could lapse back into recession. Unemployment is on the rise, while UK households are finding themselves ever more stretched as pay awards approach their second anniversary of consistently coming in below inflation.<br /><br />It also remains to be seen what impact David Cameron's decision to exempt the UK from a deal to tackle the eurozone debt crisis will have on longer-term prospects for the UK economy.<br /><br />Here, we present a detailed overview of UK economic prospects for the coming year. In a separate article, we present a round-up of <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/economic-prospects-for-2012-the-hr-bloggers-weigh-in.html">economic predictions for 2012 from a number of leading UK HR bloggers</a>.<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[<b>How long will the age of austerity last?</b><br />
<br />
The UK is firmly locked in to the age of austerity. The question now is how long it might be expected to last.<br />
<br />
Chancellor George Osborne's <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/11/osbornes-autumn-statement-a-pi.html">Autumn Statement
</a> saw the crucial admission that the UK budget deficit is not now 
expected to be eliminated until 2017, missing the previously stated 
target of the end of the current Parliament in 2015.<br />
<br />
So how long might the UK's age of austerity be expected to last?<br />
<br />
We could be looking at a period of <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/11/is-long-haul-austerity-in-pros.html">long-haul austerity</a>
 for the UK economy, or even <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/07/is-permanent-austerity-in-pros.html">permanent austerity</a>
 in our lifetimes. <br />
<br />
The FT's Martin Wolf takes <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f1b5d790-1a84-11e1-ae14-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1fGjA8taP">a particularly sombre view</a>:<br /><blockquote>
The big facts are that the UK is set for a lost decade and a longer 
period of stringency than expected. The Government's position is that 
there is no alternative. That has now become a self-fulfilling 
prophecy.<br /></blockquote>
Public sector austerity will be <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/public-leaders-network/2011/dec/01/worst-public-sector-cuts-come">"the new normal for the next 20 years,"</a> argues consultant Steven Toft. Toft says:<br /><blockquote>
Further severe spending cuts [...] look unavoidable unless taxes rise 
significantly or we get a near-miraculous growth spurt in the next five 
years. Whoever is in office during the next decade will have to deal 
with this problem eventually.<br /></blockquote>
Tax rises are an ever less palatable option for the Coalition 
Government. <a href="http://ir2.flife.de/data/natcen-social-research/igb_html/pdf/chapters/BSA28_Introduction.pdf">Public support for tax rises to prop up public spending</a> is 
in sharp decline,
 according to new data from the National Centre for Social Research. It 
finds:<br /><blockquote>
[S]upport for government increasing taxes and spending more on health, 
education and social benefits has halved from a peak of 63% [in 2002], 
to just 31% [in 2011]. It's striking that support for 'tax and spend' 
policies has reduced to a level last seen in 1983 in the aftermath of 
recession and continuing 'stagflation' in the economy.<br /></blockquote>
Further public spending cuts consequently appear a much more likely option.<br />
<b><br />
Why 2011 was 'the year of reluctant recovery'</b><br /><blockquote>
2011 has been the year of the reluctant recovery. Growth has 
disappointed, both here and abroad.<br /></blockquote>This is the view of
 Bank of England Governor <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2011/speech523.pdf">Mervyn King</a>.<br />
<br />
A key plank of what we might call <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/02/economic-commentary-february-2011-putting-osbornomics-to-the-test.html">'Osbornomics'</a>
 was that as public spending is scaled back, the private sector would 
step in as engine of growth and creator of jobs. The crucial second part
 of this formula is so far proving slow to materialise.<br />
<br />
UK economic growth has consequently been - as King puts it - disappointing. But economic growth is at least ongoing at present.<br /><br />Indeed, both King and Osborne received a welcome pre-Christmas gift in the shape of an upward revision to growth figures. The <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/naa2/quarterly-national-accounts/q3-2011/stb---quarterly-national-accounts-q3-2011.html">UK economy grew by 0.6% in the third quarter of 2011</a>, according to latest revised estimates of growth in gross domestic 
product (GDP) published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) just
 before Christmas (Tuesday 22 December 2011). This is up by 0.1 percentage point when compared with the 
<a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/11/xperthr-economic-commentary-november-2011-for-a-few-billion-pounds-more.html">preliminary</a>
 and <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/11/revised-q3-2011-gdp-data.html">first revised</a>
 estimates, both of which put third-quarter GDP growth at 0.5%.<br /><br />However, there were also other less positive revisions in the GDP data release. As Sunday Times Economics Editor <a href="http://www.economicsuk.com/blog/001564.html">David Smith points out</a>, "the third quarter's gain is the second's loss - that has now been revised down from 0.1% to zero."<br />
<b><br />
GDP prospects for 2012: Welcome to 'no-growth Britain'?</b><br />
Could we be about to enter the era of <a href="http://twitter.com/FlipChartRick/statuses/139645743341371392">"no-growth Britain"</a> (to use a phrase
 coined by pseudonymous HR blogger Rick)?<br />
<br />
Here is a round-up of latest GDP growth predictions:<br /><ul><li>
<b>Bank of England Governor Mervyn King</b> says UK GDP growth will be <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15927829">
"flat or close to zero"</a> 
over the first half of 2012.</li><li>UK GDP growth will run at 0.7% in 2012, while the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/dec/22/goldman-sachs-forecast-for-2012">eurozone will see GDP growth of -0.8%</a>, in the view of <b>Goldman Sachs</b>.<br /></li><li>The <a href="http://www.mortgageintroducer.com/mortgages/242049/5/Industry_in_depth/UK_headed_for_recession.htm">UK economy will contract by 0.4% in 2012</a>,
 according to <b>Legal &amp; General</b>.</li><li>The <b>Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR)</b> predicts that the UK 
economy will grow by 0.9% over the course of 2011,
 with <a href="http://cdn.budgetresponsibility.independent.gov.uk/Autumn2011EFO_web_version138469072346.pdf">growth slowing to 0.7% in 2012</a>. The BBC's Stephanie Flanders warns
 that even these predictions could prove <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15944200">"optimistic."</a> She says: "If 
there is a recession in the eurozone, it is difficult to see how that 
forecast for 2012 would be achieved." <b>Ernst &amp; Young </b>predicts <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16186333">a
 "mild" recession for the eurozone</a> in 2012, while the <b>IMF's Christine Lagarde</b> warns that the global economic outlook is <a href="http://www.arabianbusiness.com/imf-chief-says-global-outlook-is-quite-gloomy--435493.html">"quite gloomy."</a><br /></li><li>The <a href="http://www.standardchartered.com/en/resources/global-en/pdf/Research/Global%20Focus%202012.pdf">UK economy will contract by 1.3%</a> in 2012, says Standard 
Chartered.<br /></li></ul>

ONS will publish its preliminary estimate for economic growth in the 
fourth quarter of 2011 later this month, on Wednesday 25 January 2012. 
The Guardian notes that recent <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2011/dec/05/services-pmi-george-osborne">PMI survey data suggest</a>
 "that the economy will either stagnate in the fourth quarter of 2011 or
 grow extremely slowly."<br />
<br />
The most optimistic assessment would appear to be that fourth-quarter growth will come in at or very slightly above nil. <br />
<br />
It says something about our times that near-flat growth represents the 
best outcome that can realistically be hoped for at present.<br /><br /><b>GDP prospects for 2012: Will an 'Olympic bounce' help the UK skirt a double-dip recession?</b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/OlympicRings-149283.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/OlympicRings-149283.html','popup','width=606,height=355,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/OlympicRings-thumb-200x117-149283.jpg" alt="OlympicRings.JPG" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" width="200" /></a>A double-dip recession in 2012 is a possibility for the UK. But it is 
not a foregone conclusion. <br /><br />A number of factors could serve to improve 
prospects for UK GDP growth to some extent:<br /><ul><li>
<b>Growth in the first quarter of 2012</b> will be aided by the Bank of 
England's <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/news/2011/092.htm">October 2011 extension of quantitative easing</a>. Martin 
Weale <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8916720/Martin-Weale-says-Bank-of-England-ready-to-pump-more-into-economy.html">estimates</a> "that the current programme of asset purchases [will] 
boost growth by up to 0.5%, in line with the Bank's official 
calculations."
 ONS publishes its preliminary estimate of Q1 2012 GDP growth on 
Wednesday 25 April 2012.</li><li><b>Growth in the second quarter of 2012</b> could benefit from an "Olympic
 bounce." UK GDP growth in the second quarter of 2012 will be boosted by
 deferred revenue from advance Olympic ticket sales in Q2 2011. ING 
estimates that <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/blog/2011/may/31/advance-olympics-sales-economy-boost">Olympic ticket sales are worth £400 million
 in total</a>, which could have created a 0.2% "Olympic bounce" had they 
been incorporated into GDP data for Q2 2011. It remains to be seen what 
impact this deferred revenue will have on growth in the second quarter 
of 2012. ONS publishes its preliminary estimate of Q2 2012 GDP growth on
 Wednesday 25 July 2012.</li><li><b>Growth in the third quarter of 2012</b> is likely to be boosted by the 
Olympics themselves. ONS publishes its preliminary estimate of Q3 2012 
GDP growth on Thursday 25 October 2012.<br /></li></ul>
It also remains to be seen what impact the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/11/osbornes-autumn-statement-a-pi.html">measures to boost growth</a> set 
out in Osborne's Autumn Statement
 will have in 2012.<br />
<br />
<b>Budget 2012: Osborne to deliver Budget 2012 on Wednesday 21 March 2012</b><br />
Osborne has set the date for the Budget 2012. The Chancellor will 
deliver the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/12/budget-2012-osborne-to-deliver.html">Budget 2012 on Wednesday 21 March 2012</a>.<br />
<br />
<b>How will the eurozone debt crisis affect the UK economy?</b><br />
Further ahead, David Cameron's decision to veto a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-16104089">"tax and budget pact 
to tackle the eurozone debt crisis"</a> could have implications for 
longer-term growth prospects for the UK. The <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16115373">proposed fiscal compact</a> 
that emerged - to take
 effect from March 2011 - is expected to create <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/charlemagne/2011/12/britain-and-eu-summit">"a 'euro-plus' zone."</a><br />
<br />
Jon Snow of Channel 4 News reported from Brussels <a href="http://blogs.channel4.com/snowblog/british-veto-europe-edges-saving-euro/16802">on the day of Cameron's veto</a> (Friday 9 December 2011):<br /><blockquote>
The sense here is that Britain has finally left the top table, that a 
two-speed Europe is under way [with] the UK [...] in Division Two. [...]
 No one knows how damaging isolation may prove. Nor how advantageous.<br /></blockquote>Despite the agreement in Brussels, the "eurozone banking system 
[remains] on the edge of collapse" with a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8947470/Eurozone-banking-system-on-the-edge-of-collapse.html">"collateral crunch"</a> looming, 
the Telegraph reports <br />
<b><br />
Further quantitative easing: A dead cert for 2012?</b><br />
Further extensions to the Bank of England's programme of <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/assetpurchases.htm">quantitative 
easing</a> 
(defined by the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/feb/12/gordon-brown-economy">Guardian</a> as "the economic term for allowing the Bank of 
England to print more money") 
appear all but inevitable in 2012:<br /><ul><li>
The minutes of the <b>Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee (MPC)</b> 
meeting for November 2011 were interpreted as pointing to the 
<a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/minutes/mpc/pdf/2011/mpc1111.pdf">possibility of further quantitative easing in February 2012</a>.</li><li>MPC member <b>Martin Weale</b>
 said there is <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2011/speech535.pdf">"likely to be a strong case for extending the asset 
purchase programme"</a> after the current programme concludes in February 
2012.<br /></li></ul>

<b>Interest rates: Zero chance of a rate rise in 2012</b><br />
While further quantitative easing seems a certainty for 2012, there 
would appear to be no prospect of interest rates rising from their 
current record low of 0.5% (at which level they have been parked since 
March 2009) over the course of this year.<br />
<br />
The latest analysis of interest rate rise predictions compiled by 
ThisIsMoney.co.uk reports <a href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-1607881/Interest-rates-News-predictions.html">"the prospect of low rates for years,"</a>
 and finds that the "range of predictions are 2013 to 2016."<br />
<br />
<b>Inflation: On a downward path for 2012</b><br />
Inflation now appears to have embarked on a long-predicted downward path
 - albeit slowly. <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_246854.pdf">Latest inflation data</a> from ONS show:<br /><ul><li>
<b>Retail prices index (RPI) inflation</b> stood at 5.2% in November 2011, down 0.2 percentage points from 5.4% in October.</li><li><b>Consumer prices index (CPI) inflation </b>fell back to 4.8% in November
 2011 (from 5.0% in October). CPI nonetheless continues to overshoot the
 Government's symmetrical target of one percentage point either side of 
2%, just as it has for each successive month since December 2009.<br /></li></ul>

Inflation is expected to fall back sharply in 2012 as the influence of 
the January 2011 VAT hike to 20% falls out of the inflation data:<br /><ul><li>
<b>RPI inflation</b> will drop throughout 2012, from 4.1% in the first 
quarter to 2.8% by the fourth quarter, according to <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/111411/.aspx#t1">latest forecasts 
compiled by XpertHR</a> 
(XpertHR subscription required).</li><li><b>CPI "inflation</b> is likely to fall sharply to the 2% target or below"
 during 2012, according to <a href="http://www.standardchartered.com/en/resources/global-en/pdf/Research/Global%20Focus%202012.pdf">Standard Chartered</a>.<br /></li></ul>

But as inflation falls, concerns about the possibility of deflation are 
becoming more widespread. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/nov/21/global-economy-risks-deflationary-spiral">The Guardian reports</a> that "the head of the 
City's financial watchdog, Adair Turner, [recently] warned that the 
global economy was at risk of a deflationary spiral as the private 
sector and governments seek to pay off their debts at the same time."<br />
<br />
<b>Pay awards: On track for two years of below-inflation pay awards</b><br />
Below-inflation pay awards mean that <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/08/below-inflation-pay-awards-mea-1.html">recovery is proving more painful 
than recession</a>
 for many UK households. Recent analysis from the IFS suggests that if 
latest OBR projections prove correct, real household <a href="http://www.ifs.org.uk/budgets/as2011/tax_benefits_as11.pdf">disposable incomes 
are likely to be lower by 2016</a> than they 
were in 2006.<br />
<br />
Pay awards for UK workers - as measured by the XpertHR pay databank - 
have now been <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/12/xperthr-economic-commentary-december-2011-in-the-bleak-midwinter.html">stuck below the level of inflation for nearly two years</a>.
 <br />
<br />
However, the gap between pay awards and inflation is narrowing slowly. 
The median <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/111414/.aspx">whole economy pay award held steady at 2%</a> (XpertHR subscription 
required) over the three months to 30 November 2011, according to 
XpertHR data. With RPI inflation falling back to 5.2% in November 2011, 
the gap between pay awards and inflation has consequently narrowed to 
3.2 percentage points.<br />
<br />
But it seems all but certain that pay awards will notch up their second 
anniversary of coming in consistently below the level of RPI inflation, 
when XpertHR publishes its analysis of whole economy reward trends over 
the three months to December 2011, later this month (on Friday 20 
January 2012). <br />
<br />
<b>Pay prospects for 2012</b><br />
So what of pay prospects for 2012?<br /><ul><li>
<b>Public sector workers</b> <b>can expect ongoing pay austerity.</b> Osborne 
announced in his <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/11/osbornes-autumn-statement-a-pi.html">Autumn Statement</a>
 that public sector pay rises will be capped at an average of 1% 
following the end of the current two-year pay freeze (which concludes in
 either April 2012 or April 2013, depending on department).</li><li><b>Private sector pay prospects for 2012 are more positive.</b> Private 
sector employers expect across-the-board pay increases awarded in the 
2011/2012 wage round to be <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/hr-benchmarking/question/141287/.aspx">worth 2.5% at the median</a>, XpertHR 
Benchmarking research reveals (see chart). Two-fifths of private sector 
employers expect <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/hr-benchmarking/question/141283/.aspx">pay awards for 2011/2012 will be higher than the 
previous year's</a> (XpertHR 
Benchmarking subscription required).<br /></li></ul>
<a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/10/XpertHRBenchmarkingPrivateSectorPayExpectations20112012-thumb-500x328-144713-144714.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/10/XpertHRBenchmarkingPrivateSectorPayExpectations20112012-thumb-500x328-144713-144714.html','popup','width=500,height=328,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/10/XpertHRBenchmarkingPrivateSectorPayExpectations20112012-thumb-500x328-144713-thumb-500x328-144714.jpg" alt="Thumbnail image for XpertHRBenchmarkingPrivateSectorPayExpectations20112012.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="500" height="328" /></a><br /><b>Unemployment to go from bad to worse in 2012</b><br />
The <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/12/unemployment-data-14-december.html">UK unemployment rate has hit its highest level in 15 years</a>,
 according to latest data from ONS:<br /><ul><li>
The <b>headline unemployment rate</b> (on the ILO definition) rose to 8.3% between August and October 2011.</li><li>The <b>number of unemployed people</b> rose by 128,000, to 2.64 million.</li><li><b>ONS comments: </b>"The unemployment rate is the highest since 1996 and 
the number of unemployed people is the highest since 1994."<br /></li></ul>

Employment Minister Chris Grayling argues that the latest unemployment 
figures suggest that <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/dec/14/uk-unemployment-jobs-market-stabilising">"the labour market is stabilising."</a><br />
<br />
But few economic commentators appear to share Grayling's view. The 
majority expect the UK unemployment situation to get worse rather than 
better in 2012:<br /><ul><li>The <b>BCC</b> predicts that <a href="http://www.britishchambers.org.uk/zones/policy/press-releases_1/bcc-quarterly-economic-forecast-uncertainty-will-delay-upturn-until-late-2012.html">unemployment will hit 8.7% in Q4 2012</a> (2.77 
million).</li><li>The <b>CIPD </b>expects <a href="http://www.cipd.co.uk/hr-resources/survey-reports/cipd-surveys-overview-hr-trends-prospects-2012.aspx">unemployment to hit 2.85 million by the end of 2012</a>, and to peak at 2.9 million in the first half of 2013.</li><li>Retail consultants <b>CBRE </b>predict that a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/dec/31/high-street-la-senza-closes">"retail recession"</a> is about to hit UK high streets, and estimates that retailers could cut up to 40,000 jobs over the next 18 months.<br /></li><li>The unemployment rate for 2012 as a whole will be 8.5%, according to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/dec/22/goldman-sachs-forecast-for-2012"><b>Goldman Sachs</b></a>.<br /></li><li>"The effects of the eurozone crisis will hit [unemployment] over 
the next six months [...] The eurocrisis excuse may well be needed, and be
 genuine, from March [2012] when the picture around January starts to 
emerge." This is the view of the <a href="http://cmpo.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/unemployment-and-the-euro-zone-crisis/"><b>CMPO</b>'s Paul Gregg</a>.<br /></li></ul>
<b>Youth unemployment set to keep rising in 2012</b><br />
Youth unemployment <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/11/youth-unemployment-data-16-nov.html">rocketed past the so-called "million milestone"</a> in 
the closing months of 2011.
 Latest youth unemployment data show:<br /><ul><li>
The <b>number of unemployed 16 to 24 year olds</b> in the UK rose to 1.03 million over the three months to October 2011.</li><li>The <b>youth unemployment rate</b> rose to 22.0% over the three months between August and October 2011.&nbsp; <br /></li></ul>
The BCC predicts that <a href="http://www.britishchambers.org.uk/zones/policy/press-releases_1/bcc-quarterly-economic-forecast-uncertainty-will-delay-upturn-until-late-2012.html">youth unemployment will continue to rise this 
year</a>. It expects that 42% of 16 and 17 year olds and 22.5% of 18 to 24 
year olds will be unemployed by the fourth quarter of 2012.<br />
<br />
Some commentators are now seeking to coin terms to describe the plight 
of young people in today's labour market. These include the following:<br /><ul><li>
<b>Generation U: </b>This refers to "unemployed or underemployed 
undergraduates forced to take useless or unsatisfying work until they 
find their true calling," according to <a href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-1727299/Generation-U.html">ThisIsMoney.co.uk</a>.</li><li><b>The Precariat:</b> Author Guy Standing defines <a href="http://www.bloomsburyacademic.com/view/The-Precariat/book-ba-9781849664554.xml">"the precariat"</a> as "a 
growing number of people across the world living and working 
precariously, usually in a series of short-term jobs, without recourse 
to stable occupational identities or careers, stable social protection 
or protective regulations relevant to them. They include migrants, but 
also locals."•&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /></li></ul>
In Standing's view, the so-called "precariat" could "produce new 
instabilities in society [and] are increasingly frustrated and dangerous
 because they have no voice."<br />
<b><br />
Will we see further social unrest in 2012?</b><br />
The <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/08/uk-riots-police-cuts-and-hr-wh.html">rioting and senseless destruction</a>
 suffered by many UK towns and cities during August 2011 will be one of 
ugliest memories of last year for many people.<br />
<br />
How likely is it that we might see further social unrest in 2012? <br /><ul><li>
The risk of social unrest is increasing around the world, according
 to the <a href="http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_166021.pdf"><b>ILO World of Work report 2011</b></a>.
 The <a href="http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/press-and-media-centre/news/WCMS_166395/lang--en/index.htm">ILO warns</a> that
 "the world economy is likely to create only half the jobs needed," 
resulting in a new and deeper jobs recession. Against this background, 
the ILO's new social unrest index suggests that "in over 45 of the 118 
countries examined, the risk of social unrest is rising. This is 
especially the case in advanced economies, notably the EU, the Arab 
region and to a lesser extent Asia." The ILO finds that "unemployment is
 most strongly associated with the estimated risks of social unrest, 
along with disposable income."</li><li>In a sobering blog post, <b>Frances Coppola</b> argues that 
"austerity-driven recessions" across the eurozone could result in 
<a href="http://coppolacomment.blogspot.com/2011/11/austerity-and-eurozone.html">revolution or even war</a>.
 She says: "[O]nce recession takes hold in the entire eurozone, people 
will start to see that their lives and their futures are being 
sacrificed on the altar of a political dream that is rapidly becoming a 
nightmare - and they will take action. We are already seeing political 
unrest in Greece, Spain and Portugal. As recession deepens, this unrest 
will worsen and may be violently repressed - a fertile ground for actual
 revolt and even war."</li></ul>The UK establishment is taking the prospect of further social unrest in 2012 very seriously indeed:<br /><ul><li>
The <b>Foreign Office </b>warns that <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8917077/Prepare-for-riots-in-euro-collapse-Foreign-Office-warns.html">instability in the eurozone could 
cause dangerous unrest</a>.&nbsp;</li><li><b>Armed Forces</b> planners believe economic issues arising from the 
eurozone crisis pose a "strategic risk" to the UK. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/8957513/Eurozone-crisis-poses-military-risk-warns-defence-chief-General-Sir-David-Richards.html"><b>General Sir David 
Richards</b> said</a>:
 "I am clear that the single biggest strategic risk facing the UK today 
is economic rather than military. [...] The country's main effort must be 
the economy. No country can defend itself if bankrupt."</li></ul>The <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8976204/Treasury-plans-for-euro-failure.html">Treasury</a>, meanwhile, is reportedly "considering plans to restrict the 
flow of money in and out of Britain to protect the economy in the event 
of a full-blown euro break-up."<br /><br />

<b>Prospects for public sector strike action in 2012</b><br />
It 
remains to be seen if this year will bring further mass strike 
action in protest at planned public sector pensions cuts, following on from the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/12/xperthr-economic-commentary-december-2011-in-the-bleak-midwinter.html">"day of action,"</a>
 which involved <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15953806">"up to two million UK workers"</a> (according to union estimates 
quoted by the BBC) on Wednesday 30 November 2011.<br /><br />Negotiations between the Coalition Government and trade unions are ongoing as 2012 commences, but appear close to conclusion.<br />
<br />
At present, it would therefore seem that while mass <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/12/prospects-for-public-sector-st-1.html">public sector strike action in 2012 is possible, it is not necessarily probable</a>.<br />
<br />
Any ongoing public sector strike action will be firmly opposed by the Coalition Government. Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude has suggested that the <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/11/strike-laws-could-be-changed-t.html">Government 
could be willing to consult on changes to the strike laws</a>,
 if strike action proves "very disruptive."<br />
<br />
<b>A happy new year to all XpertHR readers!</b><br />
Please allow me to take this opportunity to wish a happy and prosperous 
New Year to one and all! And do please check out <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/101651/.aspx#2012">XpertHR's 2012 HR 
Calendar</a> to keep 
track of all the important HR events and add them to your Outlook 
calendar.<br /><ul><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/economic-prospects-for-2012-the-hr-bloggers-weigh-in.html"><b>Economic prospects for 2012: The HR bloggers weigh in</b></a><br />
</li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/pay-bargaining-statistics-january-2012.html"><b>Key bargaining statistics on pay, prices and employment for 
January 2012</b></a></li><li><b>The '2012' image at the top of this page was <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:No_2012_Olympics.jp">sourced from Wikimedia Commons</a>.<br /></b></li></ul>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Economic prospects for 2012: The HR bloggers weigh in</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/economic-prospects-for-2012-the-hr-bloggers-weigh-in.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.219902</id>

    <published>2012-01-01T00:02:01Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-05T15:31:03Z</updated>

    <summary>We canvass the views of a number of leading UK HR bloggers and commentators on economic prospects for 2012.Kevin J Ball, Mervyn Dinnen, Neil Morrison and Steven Toft have their say.As a companion piece to XpertHR&apos;s January 2012 economic commentary...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Carty</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/HRIntelligentsia-149246.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/HRIntelligentsia-149246.html','popup','width=571,height=640,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/HRIntelligentsia-thumb-250x280-149246.jpg" alt="HRIntelligentsia.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" width="200" /></a><b>We canvass the views of a number of leading UK HR bloggers and commentators on economic prospects for 2012.<br /><br />Kevin J Ball, Mervyn Dinnen, Neil Morrison and Steven Toft have their say.</b><br /><br />As a companion piece to <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/xperthr-economic-commentary-january-2012-prospects-for-the-coming-year.html">XpertHR's January 2012 economic commentary</a> article, I'm delighted to be able to present a round-up of economic predictions for the coming year from four leading UK HR bloggers:<br /><ul><li>Kevin J Ball</li><li>Mervyn Dinnen</li><li>Neil Morrison</li><li>Steven Toft<br /></li></ul>I am extremely grateful to each of these gentlemen for taking the time to contribute their personal expectations for the UK economy in 2012 and beyond. You can find out more about each contributor from the short introductory paragraph preceding their own words. <br /> <div><br /></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/KevinBall-149257.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/KevinBall-149257.html','popup','width=439,height=500,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/KevinBall-thumb-150x170-149257.jpg" alt="KevinBall.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" width="150" /></a><b>Kevin J Ball: "For HR, I'm afraid it's more of the same for 2012." </b><br /><i>HR Director Kevin J Ball is the author of the <a href="http://www.west-consulting.com/">People Matters</a> blog. Kevin wrote the classic first post in XpertHR's <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2010/08/if-i-could-change-one-thing-ab-5.html">If I could change one thing about HR...</a> series and also contributed his views on <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/01/economic-commentary-january-2011-prospects-for-the-coming-year.html">economic prospects for 2011</a> to last year's round-up, which he revisits here. You can <a href="http://twitter.com/kevinjball">follow Kevin on Twitter</a> and connect with him via <a href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/kevin-ball/0/7bb/250">LinkedIn</a>. </i><br /><br /><blockquote>Last year I predicted a <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/01/economic-commentary-january-2011-prospects-for-the-coming-year.html">range of numbers</a> for the economy. All were drawn from decent sources and all of them proved to be wrong. GDP (worse than predicted), Inflation (worse), pay settlements (slightly better) and unemployment (slightly better again). <br /><br />This year I'm probably better sticking to something broad - things aren't going to get substantially better in 2012: we are probably back in recession right now, inflation may well tail off, unemployment will get worse and pay isn't going up anytime soon. <br /><br />The saddest thing that George Osborne and I both learned last year is that all of this is largely out of the hands of UK Government anyhow. Look East for growth and investment and expect to pay an awful lot for it.<br /><br />I also wrote about political risk. I characterised our politicians as tiptoeing between the stalling US recovery and the eurozone debt crisis and wondered if the coalition could hold.<br /><br />Now it's 2012, and the US is showing only the faint signs of life you'd associate with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_bounce">dead cat bounce</a> and it looks like the markets may push the EU off a cliff before the end of the year.<br /><br />Whether Cameron and Clegg have just rewound the UK and Europe to 1970 or are skilfully <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaFqNSLu6U4">dancing the funky Gibbon</a> with their own backbenchers is a matter of guess work. My money would be on Thatcher's children finally getting their way and severing our ties (the good faith ones if not the political ones, just yet) with our biggest market. Once more the coalition looks precarious on paper but they've been surprisingly steady so far. A little side note to come out of the recent EU summit was on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16075890">employment law harmonisation</a>. Nice work to get to after we've untied the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordian_Knot">Gordian Knot</a>. <br /><br />For HR, I'm afraid it's more of the same for 2012. Siege budgets and the Board stockpiling cash will make it really tough to do the development work most of us love.&nbsp; <br /><br />No business is going to take a bet on anything other than the surest of sure things and we will all struggle with the depressing reality of redundancy programmes and other, even less savoury, regressive work. <br /><br />The predicted erosion of employment rights in the UK is materialising but opportunity continues to exist for business to do good for themselves, the economy and society through work placements, apprenticeship schemes and other initiatives for tackling long-term unemployment (such as <a href="http://www.princes-trust.org.uk/support_us/corporate_supporters/our_partners/marks_and_spencer.aspx">this</a>). With a little imagination, this is one opportunity for innovation in HR that may take us past hand-wringing and into doing something useful.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /></blockquote><br /><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/MervynDinnen-149260.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/MervynDinnen-149260.html','popup','width=477,height=476,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/MervynDinnen-thumb-150x149-149260.jpg" alt="MervynDinnen.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" width="150" /></a><b>Mervyn Dinnen: "A post-traumatic flat-lining economy suffering regular aftershocks." </b><br /><i>It's a pleasure to welcome Mervyn Dinnen for his debut piece for XpertHR. Mervyn is the Content and Community Manager at <a href="http://www.jobsite.co.uk/">Jobsite</a>, and writes the T Recs blog. You can <a href="http://twitter.com/mervyndinnen">follow Mervyn on Twitter</a> and <a href="http://uk.linkedin.com/in/mervyndinnen">connect with him via LinkedIn</a>. </i><br /><br /><blockquote>We are currently experiencing a post-traumatic flat-lining economy suffering regular aftershocks. Indeed, if a recession was defined as six months of negative growth rather than two successive quarters then we would have already had our double dip (in Q4 2010/Q1 2011), and would almost certainly be looking towards our next one at some stage in the next nine months. Any further deterioration in the EU economies will only push us further backwards. <br /><br />Whatever the rights or wrongs of the economic re-engineering that we've seen over the last 30 years or so, we're now stuck with a consumption-based economy in which there is little appetite or available funds to consume. <br /><br />Without increased consumption there will be little growth, and without growth there will be few new jobs. Anecdotally there are already signs of the feared job-loss recovery taking shape...although we are currently seeing the numbers of advertised positions holding up.<br /><br />So for 2012 I can see only more of the same. No doubt there will be some positive quarters for economic growth (almost certainly around the time of the London Olympics). <br /><br />But they will be followed by some negative quarters, with GDP remaining fairly flat and unemployment rising as a stalling economy eats into the confidence needed to create new jobs and businesses.<br /><br />There are skill shortages in some industries and I can only hope companies that can hire do so, and take a chance on up-skilling those looking for work. <br /><br />On a positive note, I do think there will be a growing creative spirit amongst the younger unemployed as they look for new ways to make money and begin to embrace a form of flexible self-employment. <br /></blockquote><br /><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/TheRightHonourableMrMorrison-149263.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/TheRightHonourableMrMorrison-149263.html','popup','width=437,height=500,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/TheRightHonourableMrMorrison-thumb-150x171-149263.jpg" alt="TheRightHonourableMrMorrison.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" width="150" /></a><b>Neil Morrison: "The story of the euro is a long way from over." </b><br /><i>Neil Morrison is the Group HR Director at Random House, and the author of the Change-Effect blog. Last year, Neil contributed a superb series of guest blog posts to XpertHR, entitled <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/employment-intelligence/2011/04/what-is-commercial-hr-1-an-hr.html">What is commercial HR?</a> You can <a href="http://twitter.com/neilmorrison">follow Neil on Twitter</a> and <a href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/neil-morrison/4/24/120">connect with him via LinkedIn</a></i>.<br /><br /><blockquote>I'm notoriously bad at predicting anything. <br />As I <a href="https://twitter.com/neilmorrison/status/146208018504220673">suggested on Twitter</a> last month, if you want to know when to buy euros, the answer is the day after me. But I'm game for anything and you never know, if I keep things broad enough I might just get something right and not embarrass myself in front of the other more worthy commentators. <br /><br />I guess the euro is as good a place as any to start. Clearly, we're yet to understand the full fallout of David Cameron's decision to veto the modification of the Lisbon Treaty. The story of the euro is a long way from over, this is just Act 1. I have to admit, whilst I don't agree with Cameron's reasons for not signing the modification, I believe in the longer term this may be a decision that looks wiser than was initially assumed. The eurozone is going dominate the news for the first half of the year. Watch out for more bad news - particularly from France. <br /><br />Back in the UK we have to expect more carnage in the retail sector in the first quarter. I'm amazed that Comet and Blacks are still trading, but I think the malaise goes much further. I'm expecting a profits warning at my old employer Home Retail Group, much as I hope that it doesn't occur, and it wouldn't surprise me to see other big high street names seriously struggling. The fear is, of course, that these will lead to store closures and resultant job losses in an already difficult labour market. <br /><br />And the labour market is an area that really worries me for 2012. The unemployment figures are nothing new, we know that they are looking grim - particularly when it comes to youth unemployment - and I don't expect to see any significant improvement. What worries me more, however, is that at the same time that we have high unemployment, we are also seeing report of recruiters being unable to fill the vacancies that they have. This "skills gap" or "attitude gap" is going to be the subject of much more attention next year. <br /><br />But don't expect any quick fixes. We have serious structural labour market issues and they won't be sorted out in months or perhaps even years. <br />On the upside? Well there isn't a huge amount I'm afraid. The Olympics SHOULD bring some comfort, but I fear this will be predominantly centred on London and the South East. <br />The Euro championships MIGHT see a slight upturn in consumer spending (and confidence if Rooney manages to stay on his feet) and a mild winter and a warm spring and summer COULD just see us through the worst of what I believe will be an economic flat-line at best or a slight worsening at... well, worst. <br /><br />Not much to be cheerful about, not much to look forward to. But I'd like to leave you with this. There are a lot of people and a lot of countries that are worse off than us. I know that won't seemingly make the next year any easier, but remember that we have a lot of things going for us, as a country, as a society and as an economy. Things will pick up, we all know they will, it is just a question of when. <br /><br /></blockquote><div align="left"><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/StevenToft-149272.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/StevenToft-149272.html','popup','width=400,height=400,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/assets_c/2011/12/StevenToft-thumb-200x200-149272.jpg" alt="StevenToft.jpg" style="float: left; margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt;" width="150" /></a><b>Steven Toft: "The outlook is for an aging, low growth economy"</b><br /></div><i>It is my privilege to welcome another HR blogger/writer making their XpertHR debut here, in the form of Steven Toft. Steven is a Director at Crucible Consulting, and is a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/search?q=steven+toft&amp;section=">contributor to the Guardian</a> and the Evening Standard. You can <a href="http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/steven-toft/7/143/829">connect with Steven via LinkedIn</a>. </i><br /><br /><blockquote>For western economies the financial crisis could not have come at a worse time. <br /><br />On its own it would have been bad enough but high debts, both public and private, aging populations and a shift in the balance of economic power to emerging economies have <a href="http://fistfulofeuros.net/afoe/last-days-of-pompeii/">compounded the problem</a>. Public debt goes up in all recessions but, in the past, high economic growth has enabled us to outrun it. Post-recession growth years of 3% and 4% increased tax revenues and enabled Britain to reduce its debt-to-GDP ratio. <br /><br />That is unlikely to happen this time. Neither the <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3746,en_2649_34573_45267516_1_1_1_1,00.html">OECD</a> nor the <a href="http://cdn.budgetresponsibility.independent.gov.uk/Autumn2011EFO_web_version138469072346.pdf">OBR</a> expect Britain to manage even 1% growth in 2012 and the OECD only predicts 1.8% for 2013. <br /><br />The longer-term forecasts don't look good either. The <a href="http://budgetresponsibility.independent.gov.uk/fiscal-sustainability-report-july-2011/">OBR's fiscal sustainability report</a> doesn't envisage growth reaching 3% for any year between now and 2030. Some time towards the end of this decade, the effects of an aging population will start to put severe strain on the public finances, adding an additional 2% to 5% of GDP onto public spending. <br /><br />Just to get the UK's debt down to pre-recession levels by 2050 will, say accountants PwC, require <a href="http://www.ftadviser.com/2011/10/14/pensions/pwc-wants-pension-age-set-to-by-IermEpIG1ksgBnX9PsAxvK/article.html;jsessionid=043C3CD2F6318CEBAD626AF4A2458E4F.mps-apr-01-8104">a further £20bn in spending cuts</a>, or equivalent tax increases, by the end of this decade. <br /><br />The outlook, then, is for an aging, low growth economy, carrying levels of debt which would have been unthinkable only three years ago. Martin Sorrell's quip about a <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23689400-alphabet-soup-that-can-spell-how-the-recession-is-shaping-up.do">'bath shaped recession'</a> was prescient. A sharp fall, followed by a long period of stagnation, the bath's corrugated bottom representing a series of small peaks and troughs, before the gradual recovery kicks in. <br /><br />The Long Depression of the 1870s and 1880s is perhaps a better historical parallel for the next decade than the Great Depression of the 1930s. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/public-leaders-network/2011/dec/01/worst-public-sector-cuts-come">Austerity will be the new normal</a> for some time to come. <br /></blockquote><ul><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/xperthr-economic-commentary-january-2012-prospects-for-the-coming-year.html"><b>XpertHR economic commentary January 2012: Prospects for the coming year</b></a></li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/pay-bargaining-statistics-january-2012.html"><b>Key bargaining statistics on pay, prices and employment for 
January 2012</b></a></li></ul>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pay bargaining statistics: January 2012</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/pay-bargaining-statistics-january-2012.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2012:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.212225</id>

    <published>2012-01-01T00:00:01Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-01T06:26:29Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[We present the January 2012 XpertHR Salary Surveys pay bargaining statistics table, which provides the latest monthly&nbsp;summary of&nbsp;key data for pay specialists. XpertHR Salary Surveys economic commentary for January 2012Economic prospects for 2012: The HR bloggers weigh inXpertHR Salary Surveys...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Carty</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Pay bargaining stats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="cpi" label="cpi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="employment" label="employment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="inflation" label="inflation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payawards" label="pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rpi" label="rpi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="unemployment" label="unemployment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<p>We present the January 2012 XpertHR Salary Surveys pay bargaining 
statistics table, which provides the latest monthly&nbsp;summary of&nbsp;key data 
for pay specialists. </p>
<ul><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/xperthr-economic-commentary-january-2012-prospects-for-the-coming-year.html">XpertHR Salary Surveys economic commentary for January 2012</a></li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2012/01/economic-prospects-for-2012-the-hr-bloggers-weigh-in.html">Economic prospects for 2012: The HR bloggers weigh in</a><br /></li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/economics/">XpertHR Salary Surveys economic commentaries and pay bargaining statistics for earlier months</a>.</li><li><a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/paybenefits/default.aspx">Further data on pay and other labour market measures at XpertHR</a>.</li></ul> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<table bgcolor="#ffffff" border="1" bordercolor="#999999" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="520">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left" valign="top"><strong><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">XpertHR Salary Surveys pay bargaining statistics: January 2012</font></strong></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Measure</strong></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>How calculated</strong></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>Latest</strong></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>INFLATION</strong></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Retail Prices Index (RPI) </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">% change over 12 months </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nov 11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">5.2%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Consumer Prices Index (CPI) </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">% change over 12 months </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nov 11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">4.8%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>BASIC PAY SETTLEMENTS </strong></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Whole economy - median</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Annual awards over three months </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nov 11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">2.0%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Whole economy - upper quartile</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Annual awards over three months </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nov 11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">2.5%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Whole economy - lower quartile </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Annual awards over three months </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nov 11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">0.0%</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><strong>EMPLOYMENT</strong></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><br /></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Unemployment </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">ILO measure: jobless and seeking work </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Oct 11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">2.64 million</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Redundancies </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Number of redundancies, 3 months to </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nov 11<br /></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">161,000</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Vacancies</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Number of vacancies, 3 months to </td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nov 11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<div align="center">455,000</div></td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left" valign="top">
<p>Sources: Inflation: <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Price+Indices+and+Inflation" target="_blank">ONS</a>; Pay settlements: <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/paybenefits/default.aspx" target="_blank">XpertHR pay databank</a>; Employment: <a href="http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Employment" target="_blank">ONS</a>. </p></td></tr></tbody></table>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>MPC minutes state pay growth of 2.3% in Q3</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/12/mpc-minutes-state-pay-growth-of-23-in-q3.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2011:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.220067</id>

    <published>2011-12-21T10:46:19Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-21T11:23:22Z</updated>

    <summary>The Bank of England has released the minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting on the 7 and 8 December 2011 (PDF format, 54KB) - they state there has been little change to the balance of risks to UK...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jo Doonar</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="labourcosts" label="labour costs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mpc" label="mpc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mpcminutes" label="mpc minutes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payawards" label="pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payawardsinflation" label="pay awards; inflation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: windowtext"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">The Bank of England has released the </font><a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/minutes/mpc/pdf/2011/mpc1112.pdf"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">minutes of the <span style="mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt">Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) </span>meeting on the 7 and 8 December 2011</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em"> (PDF format, 54KB) - they state there has been little change to the balance of risks to UK activity and inflation over the past month.</font></span><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">&nbsp;</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: windowtext"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">Therefore, as expected, the bank rate remained at 0.5% and there was no change to the asset purchase programme, which commenced in October.</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: windowtext"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">Although CPI inflation remains above target, the MPC once again said there was "little sign" that this has begun to generate rapid wage growth.</font></span></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: windowtext"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">Also on the subject of pay, the minutes' reveal: "Whole economy total annual pay growth had been just 2.3% in the third quarter. This remained well below pre-crisis rates, although the continued weakness of productivity growth meant that the growth of unit labour costs had been closer to its historical average rate."</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: windowtext"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">They continue: "A substantial proportion of pay settlements were agreed between January and April. The Committee's expectation was that by then demand would have slowed and inflation would be falling, which might help restrain pay growth."</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: windowtext"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1em">On the topic of quantitiative easing, the Committee is still gathering evidence on the impact of its purchases on asset prices and on the economy. The minutes' state: "Assessing the effects of the current programme was complicated by the volatility in financial markets."</font></span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pay growth ends the year on a solemn note</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/12/pay-growth-ends-the-year-on-a-solemn-note.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2011:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.219870</id>

    <published>2011-12-16T00:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-15T11:34:03Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Pay increases are stuck firmly at the 2% mark, according to the latest analysis from pay specialists XpertHR&nbsp;[£]. The median basic pay award across the whole economy stands at 2% in the three months ending 30 November 2011, unchanged for...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Sheila Attwood</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="payawards" label="pay awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payawardsinflation" label="pay awards; inflation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="payfreeze" label="pay freeze" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Pay increases are stuck firmly at the 2% mark, according to <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/111414/.aspx">the latest analysis from pay specialists XpertHR</a>&nbsp;[£].<o:p></o:p></font></span></b></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">The median basic pay award across the whole economy stands at 2% in the three months ending 30 November 2011, unchanged for the eighth consecutive rolling quarter.</font></span></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Pay awards effective in the latest analysis period include those affected by the national minimum wage - which saw a 2.5% increase to the adult rate from 1 October. Our sample includes six major retail companies that awarded a 2.5% increase to all staff - but also several others that have applied the 2.5% increase to their lowest grades only. Among this latter group, some have frozen all except the lowest rates, while others have applied lower increases for higher paid employees.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Pay freezes continue to feature in our analysis, but are concentrated in only a handful of sectors. Among our latest sample of pay settlements, almost all the recorded pay freezes are from employers in the not-for-profit, public and retail sectors. Just one manufacturing company reported a pay freeze.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Pay settlement levels in the manufacturing sector continue to outpace those elsewhere in the economy. The median manufacturing settlement stands at 2.5%, compared with 2% in the services sector.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Pay awards and inflation<o:p></o:p></font></span></b></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><font size="2"><font color="#000000">Pay awards continue to fall well below the level of inflation. During 2011 retail prices index (or RPI) inflation is expected to average 5.3%, but just 2% of 2011 pay awards on XpertHR's database of almost 1,400 awards were at or above this level. So 98% of pay awards didn't keep up with the increase in prices during 2011.<o:p></o:p></font></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><font size="2"><font color="#000000"><span style="mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">Although RPI inflation is expected to fall to an average 3.5% over the course of 2012, pay settlements are again unlikely to keep pace with inflation.</span><span style="COLOR: black"><o:p></o:p></span></font></font></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="COLOR: black"><o:p><font size="2">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm"><font color="#000000"><b><i><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">XpertHR Pay and Benefits</span></i></b><b><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"> editor Sheila Attwood said:<o:p></o:p></span></b></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font color="#000000">"Although inflation is set to fall further in the new year, it will remain at a level that is unattainable for most employers to match in pay packets. We expect to see improving pay settlement levels in 2012, but pay rises will continue to lag inflation."<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>2011 bonus payments worth 6%</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/2011/12/bonus-payments-made-in-2011.html" />
    <id>tag:www.xperthr.co.uk,2011:/blogs/pay-intelligence//356.219868</id>

    <published>2011-12-16T00:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-15T11:34:45Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Bonus payments made in 2011 were worth a median 6% of salary, according to a survey conducted by pay analysts XpertHR&nbsp;[£]. When similar research was conducted in 2008 (ahead of the recession), the median bonus payment was 10.1% of salary....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Sheila Attwood</name>
        
    </author>
    

        <category term="Employee benefits" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    

    <category term="bonuses" label="bonuses" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/blogs/pay-intelligence/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Bonus payments made in 2011 were worth a median 6% of salary, according to <a href="http://www.xperthr.co.uk/article/111390/.aspx">a survey conducted by pay analysts XpertHR</a>&nbsp;[£]. When similar research was conducted in 2008 (ahead of the recession), the median bonus payment was 10.1% of salary. However, bonus payments are expected to fall in 2012, and be worth a median 5% of salary.</font></span></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Only around half of the organisations surveyed operate a cap on the level of bonus payments - ranging from 10% to 150% of salary. Open-ended arrangements were more prevalent among financial services and retailing companies.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">The payment pot for most bonus schemes is linked directly to company profits, with individual payments determined through an assessment of employee performance. The most common method of distributing payments is to allow management discretion, followed by operating a forced distribution of payments.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">The report, based on a survey of 91 bonus schemes, reveals that the main aim of bonus schemes is to "promote and reward sustained high levels of performance". The majority of organisations reported that their scheme met this aim either partially or in full.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Given the amount of scrutiny bonus schemes have come under lately, it is perhaps surprising that only one-third of organisations have reviewed their bonus arrangements in the past year. 15% of schemes have never been analysed.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Survey respondents also identified a number of problems with their bonus schemes. Chief amongst these was employee disappointment with the size of payments, mentioned by almost half the organisations surveyed. Around one-third also cited a lack of employee understanding of the scheme; and a weak link between performance and payments.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">Despite their problems, many survey respondents feared that removal of their bonus scheme would damage their ability to recruit and retain staff, while others mentioned a loss of employee morale, and a loss of competitive edge. However, a handful of survey respondents said that little or nothing would happen if they scrapped their current bonus scheme.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><span style="COLOR: black"><font size="2">When asked what advice they would give other employers on operating a bonus scheme, communication was mentioned most often. This is best summed up in the words of one respondent: "Communication, simplicity and transparency are key."<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm; TEXT-INDENT: 0cm"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="COLOR: black"><o:p><font size="2">&nbsp;</font></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm"><font color="#000000"><b><i><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'">XpertHR Pay and Benefits</span></i></b><b><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"> editor Sheila Attwood said:<o:p></o:p></span></b></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 5pt 0cm"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'"><font color="#000000">"Bonus payments made to many junior employees are almost universally far lower than those received by employees occupying the top tiers of management. Nevertheless, they can represent a significant, if variable, element of total remuneration."<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

