-
expand
Kaur v MG Rover Group Ltd [2005] IRLR 40 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Kavanagh and others v Crystal Palace FC Ltd and another [2014] IRLR 139 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 30 June 2014
In Kavanagh and others v Crystal Palace FC Ltd and another [2014] IRLR 139 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the EAT had been wrong to interfere with an employment tribunal's judgment that an administrator had dismissed employees for an "ETO" reason. On the facts, the dismissals had been effected in order to enable the company to continue to trade and avoid liquidation.
-
- Date:
- 20 November 2013
The Court of Appeal has held that, where the reason for a TUPE-related dismissal is to continue running a business and to avoid liquidation, this can constitute an economical, technical or organisational (ETO) reason entailing changes in the workforce, meaning that such a dismissal is not automatically unfair.
-
expand
Keane v Dogan and another ET/2602003/2012
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Keane v Investigo and others EAT/0389/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Kearney v Royal Mail Group Ltd ET/3100476/2010
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 4 October 2011
In this well-publicised case, the employer was in the unenviable position of having to decide whether or not an employee who had been charged with, but not yet tried for, murder should be dismissed.
-
expand
Kearns v Glencore UK Ltd [2013] EWHC 3697 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Keating v WH Smith Retail Holdings Ltd ET/2300631/19
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Keeley v Fosroc International Ltd [2006] IRLR 961 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 3 April 2007
In Keeley v Fosroc International Ltd [2006] IRLR 961, the Court of Appeal held that a provision for enhanced redundancy payments set out in a staff handbook that was incorporated into the employment contract constituted an express term of the individual contract of employment, thus conferring a contractual right to the payment.
-
expand
Keeping Kids Company v (1) Smith and others (2) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2018] IRLR 484 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 8 March 2018
In Keeping Kids Company (in compulsory liquidation) v Smith and others, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that events occurring after redundancy proposals did not excuse a charity's obligation to consult collectively, but could potentially be relied on to reduce the amount of the protective award.
-
expand
Kelly v Covance Laboratories Ltd EAT/0186/15
(1 report relating to this case)