-
expand
William Hill Organisation Ltd v Tucker [1998] IRLR 313 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 July 1998
In the absence of an express contractual term entitling a bookmaker to send the senior dealer in its spread-betting business on garden leave, it was under an obligation to allow him to perform the duties of the post to which it had appointed him in accordance with his contract both during his notice period and before he gave in his notice, holds the Court of Appeal in William Hill Organisation Ltd v Tucker.
-
expand
Williams and others v British Airways plc [2011] IRLR 948 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 20 September 2011
The European Court of Justice has considered whether or not "normal remuneration" during a period of annual leave should include allowances on top of basic pay, in the context of a dispute over how the holiday pay of British Airways pilots who are paid flying allowances as well as basic pay should be calculated.
-
expand
Williams and others v Compair Maxam Ltd [1982] IRLR 83 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 November 1996
In Akzo Coatings plc v Thompson and others, the EAT holds that an industrial tribunal erred in law in applying the guidelines on redundancy selection in Williams and others v Compair Maxam Ltd to the way in which an employer dealt with the possibility of alternative employment for redundant employees.
-
expand
Williams and others v Whitbread Beer Co 19 June 1996 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 1997
In Williams and others v Whitbread Beer Co the Court of Appeal restores the decision of an industrial tribunal that an employer unfairly dismissed three employees for drunken, abusive and violent behaviour in circumstances where the misconduct took place outside work and where it was the employer who had provided the opportunity for the employees to drink.
-
expand
Williams v Ferrosan Ltd [2004] IRLR 607 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Williams v HM Prison Service EAT/1236/00
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 June 2002
In Balamoody v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal should have constructed a hypothetical comparator against which to consider whether there was evidence to support an inference that the complainant's treatment had been tainted with race discrimination. And the EAT holds in Williams v H M Prison Service that there is no additional duty on a tribunal to construct and consider the position of a hypothetical comparator.
-
expand
Williams v J Walter Thompson Group Ltd [2005] IRLR 376 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 27 May 2005
In Williams v J Walter Thompson Group Ltd, the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal was correct to decide that a blind employee suffered unlawful disability discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal when her employer failed to provide her with the specialist equipment and training necessary for her to carry out the IT work for which she was appointed.
-
expand
Williams v Leeds United Football Club Ltd [2015] EWHC 376 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2015
David Malamatenios is a partner, Colin Makin, Sandra Martins and Krishna Santra are senior associates, and Hinal Raichura is a trainee at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Williams v London & South East Railway Ltd ET/1101780/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Williams v Talkington Bates Midland Ltd ET/3300556/2012
(1 report relating to this case)