Our cases database provides unmatched coverage of precedent-setting cases from the Employment Appeal Tribunal and appellate courts. It also provides reports of selected tribunal cases, including discrimination cases where compensation was awarded. Browse the reports by topic, case title or key word search. View the latest law reports or check the stop press for up-to-the-minute news on key cases.


Now In: Equal pay > Effect of EC law

XpertHR has 5 case reports relating to the case: R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez [1999] IRLR 253 ECJ.
Click the title to view an article.


content icon
Sex discrimination: Legality of two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal protection still unclear
Source: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin  Date: 01-03-1999
A judicial award of compensation for breach of the right not to be unfairly dismissed constitutes "pay" within the meaning of Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome, rules the European Court of Justice in R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez.

content icon
ECJ sends mixed signal
Source: Equal Opportunities Review  Date: 01-03-1999
In R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Seymour-Smith and Perez (9 February 1998) EOR84A, the European Court of Justice sets out principles for determining whether a Member State has indirectly discriminated contrary to EU law.

content icon
Sex and race discrimination: EC sex discrimination law
Source: Discrimination Case Law Guide  Date: 01-02-2006
This section of the Discrimination Case Law Guide looks at remedies for sex discrimination under EC and UK law.

content icon
Equal pay: Scope of EC law
Source: Discrimination Case Law Guide  Date: 01-02-2006
This section of the Discrimination Case Law Guide looks at the scope of EC laws on equal pay.

content icon
Qualifying period remains uncertain
Source: Discrimination Case Law Digest  Date: 01-03-1999
The European Court of Justice's long-awaited ruling in R v Secretary of State ex parte Seymour-Smith leaves it for the House of Lords to decide whether the increase in the qualifying period in 1985 for bringing a complaint of unfair dismissal from one to two years indirectly discriminated against women contrary to European Community law.