Now In:
Transfer of undertakings > Effect of a transfer on contracts of employment
XpertHR has 4 case reports
relating to the case: Power v Regent Security Services Ltd [2007] IRLR 226 EAT.
Click the title to view an article.
Monthly law update: March 2007
Source: Occupational Pensions Date:
01-03-2007
Occupational Pensions presents its Monthly law update detailing the progress of legislation and listing relevant new Regulations, other new regulatory material and new court and tribunal rulings.
Power v Regent Security Services Ltd
Source: XpertHR case report Date:
18-04-2007
In Power v Regent Security Services Ltd [2007] IRLR 226 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that an employee could rely on a variation to his contract of employment that raised his retirement age to 65 and occurred as a result of a transfer.
Transfer of undertakings: Employees may rely on advantageous variations to contractual terms
Source: IRS Employment Review Date:
09-05-2007
In Power v Regent Security Services Ltd [2007] IRLR 226 EAT, a case brought prior to the 2006 TUPE Regulations coming into effect, the EAT holds that an employee could enforce a contractual variation agreed with the transferee, even though the transfer was the reason for the change. It was not open to the employer to seek to resile from the change on the grounds that the variation was by reason of the transfer itself and therefore void.
In court 2007: a year of equality cases
Source: Occupational Pensions Date:
01-02-2008
Our 18th annual review of the pension cases dealt with by the courts and tribunals summarises 38 judgments. Cases concerning age and sex discrimination dominate.