Browse frequently asked questions and answers on key HR issues. Navigate by topic or key word search. View latest additions or suggest a question to the XpertHR editorial team.


Can an employer treat part-time workers less favourably than it treats full-time workers?

Can the terms and conditions of employment differ between full- and part-time workers?

What happens if an employer treats part-time workers less favourably than comparable full-time workers?

Can an employer choose to employ a full-time person rather than two part-time people?

Is an employer at liberty to determine its own levels of pay?

How can part-time workers' rights to indivisible benefits such as company cars be dealt with?

What are part-time workers' rights to paid holiday?

If a part-time or shift-working employee is not scheduled to work on a bank holiday, is he or she entitled to an additional day's holiday?

If a part-time employee is contracted to work a half day on a bank holiday, is he or she entitled to an additional half day's holiday to take at another time?


Are part-time workers entitled to bank holidays?

Under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000/1551) a part-time worker has the right not to be treated less favourably than a comparable full-time worker on the grounds that he or she is a part-timer. This includes entitlement to bank holidays.

Where an employer includes bank holidays in the statutory minimum entitlement to paid holiday under the Working Time Regulations 1998 this is unlikely to cause problems. However, where full-time workers are entitled to bank holidays in addition to their statutory entitlement to holiday, difficulties may arise.

It may be fair to allow part-time workers to take a bank holiday where their day of work coincides with a bank holiday, particularly if a shift system means that both full-timers and part-timers are equally likely to be rostered to work on a bank holiday. However, where workers work fixed days each week, part-timers could be disadvantaged by such a practice. As most bank holidays fall on a Monday or a Friday, those part-timers who never work on these days will be entitled to proportionately fewer days off than full-timers who regularly work on these days. In these circumstances the disadvantage could be removed by giving all part-timers pro rata entitlement to time off in lieu of bank holidays according to the number of hours they work. However, the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 provide protection only where any less favourable treatment is on the grounds that the worker is part time. In McMenemy v Capita Business Services Ltd [2007] IRLR 400 CS, an employee who worked Wednesday to Friday claimed that his lack of entitlement to time off in lieu of Monday bank holidays amounted to less favourable treatment, but the Court of Session held that the cause of the difference in treatment was the fact that the employee did not work on Mondays, not that he was part time.

Want to see more?

login arrow blue

XpertHR provides answers to more than 1,000 FAQs. But that's not all...
Request a demo today to find out how XpertHR can benefit your organisation

Do part-time workers require an induction programme?

Is it permissible for an employer to offer a pension scheme only to full-time employees?

Where an employee has asked for a phased return from long-term sickness absence, can the employer decrease his or her pay to reflect the reduced hours being worked?

Is it permissible for an employer to dismiss part-time workers in preference to employees on full-time contracts?

Do employers have to pay redundancy payments to part-time employees?

Where a full-time position is advertised, is the employer required to consider an applicant who informs it at interview that she would like to work part time?

Top