The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has refused to allow a claim to proceed where it was submitted shortly before the time limit ran out, but rejected because of an incorrect early conciliation number being entered on the ET1. The claim was resubmitted, but outside the time limit.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that a tribunal was right to reject a claim where the claimant had not contacted Acas under the early conciliation procedure. While the claimant's reluctance to initiate the procedure was understandable, given that the claim involved allegations of sexual harassment, the claimant did not fall within any of the statutory exemptions.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has held that, when deciding whether or not collective redundancy consultation obligations are triggered, the number of proposed redundancies should be measured in the entity to which the workers made redundant are assigned to carry out their duties, rather than across the whole organisation.
You said it...
I would certainly recommend XpertHR for its up-to-date legal information and ability to make one’s life much easier at the click of a button.
The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.
XpertHR is designed to work consistently across a range of browsers, including Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Opera and Safari. If you encounter any issues or problems with our site we would appreciate your feedback.
Reed Business Information Limited trading as XpertHR is an Appointed Representative of ITC Compliance Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.