This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Age discrimination: law firm's mandatory retirement age of 65 for partners was justified

This report relates to 1 case(s)

  • expand disabled

    Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes ET/1100275/2007 (0 other reports)

Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes ET/1100275/2007

age discrimination | justification | partnership | compulsory retirement

In the final chapter of this long-running case on the justification of a compulsory retirement age for partners in a law firm, the employment tribunal applied Supreme Court guidance and concluded that a requirement for partners to step down at 65 was justified.