This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Age discrimination: law firm's mandatory retirement age of 65 for partners was justified

This report relates to 1 case(s)

  • expand disabled

    Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (no 2) [2014] IRLR 748 EAT (0 other reports)

Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (no 2) [2014] IRLR 748 EAT

age discrimination | compulsory retirement at 65 | justification

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has dismissed an appeal against a finding that a mandatory retirement age of 65 for partners in a law firm was justified.