-
expand
Akbar and Ahmed v Metro Private Hire (Keighley) Ltd [1994] IT/11064/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 1994
Rejecting claims that a private hire company had unlawfully discriminated against two Asian applicants, a Leeds industrial tribunal (Chair: J Prophet) in Akbar and Ahmed v Metro Private Hire (Keighley) Ltd, expresses concern over the way the Commission for Racial Equality went about securing evidence of discrimination.
-
expand
Alabaster v Barclays Bank plc and Secretary of State for Social Security (No.2) [2005] IRLR 576 CA
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 3 February 2006
We review recent significant equal pay cases and their implications. Developments of note include the application of the "single source" test to comparators within an employment unit, and a reference to the ECJ on whether use of length of service as a pay system criterion requires specific objective justification.
-
- Date:
- 24 June 2005
In Alabaster v Barclays Bank plc, the Court of Appeal holds that the answer to the problem of how to enable an employee effectively to enforce her right to claim arrears of maternity pay (owed to her as a result of a failure to take into account a pay rise awarded before her maternity leave started, but after the reference period for calculating her maternity pay had ended) lay in removing the requirement in s.1(1) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 for her to point to a male comparator.
-
expand
Alabaster v Woolwich plc and Secretary of State for Social Security [2004] IRLR 486 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 June 2004
In Alabaster v Woolwich plc, the European Court of Justice holds that article 119 (now 141) of the EC Treaty of Rome requires that earnings-related maternity pay must reflect any pay rise awarded between the start of the reference period (upon which the level of the earnings-related maternity pay is based) and the end of the employee's maternity leave.
-
expand
Alamo Group (Europe) Ltd v Tucker and another [2003] IRLR 266 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 August 2003
In Alamo Group (Europe) Ltd v (1) Tucker (2) Twose of Tiverton Ltd, the EAT holds that where a transferor fails to comply with its duty to inform and consult upon a relevant transfer, liability for that failure passes to the transferee under reg. 5 of the TUPE Regulations.
-
expand
Alan Gibson v The Scottish Ambulance Service EATS/0052/04
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Albion Automotive Ltd v Walker and others [2002] EWCA Civ 946 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 10 January 2003
In Albion Automotive Ltd v Walker and others, the Court of Appeal upholds an employment tribunal's decision that an employer who made enhanced redundancy payments according to an agreed policy for a number of years created a custom and practice from which the tribunal could infer that the employer and/or its successors intended to be contractually bound to make those payments.
-
expand
Albron Catering BV v FNV Bondgenoten and another Case C-242/09 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 December 2010
Ceri Hughes, David Parry, and Carly Mather, associates at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.
-
expand
Alcan Extrusions v Yates and others [1996] IRLR 327 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 August 1996
The unilateral imposition of a continuous rolling shift pattern in place of the traditional shifts previously worked by employees in accordance with their contracts amounted to an express dismissal of those employees, who reserved their right to complain of unfair dismissal even though they worked under the new system, holds the EAT in Alcan Extrusions v Yates and others.
-
expand
Alemo-Herron and others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd Case C-426/11 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2013
In Alemo-Herron and others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd Case C-426/11 ECJ, the ECJ held that "dynamic" clauses in contracts of employment that refer to collective agreements negotiated and adopted after the transfer are not enforceable against a transferee that has not been able to participate in the negotiating process.
-
expand
Alexander and another v Bridgen Enterprises Ltd [2006] IRLR 422 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 3 November 2006
In Alexander and another v Bridgen Enterprises Ltd [2006] IRLR 422 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal holds that two employees were automatically unfairly dismissed in breach of the statutory dismissal procedure because the employer had not provided sufficient information about their selection for redundancy in advance of the dismissal meeting.