-
expand
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v Vento [2001] IRLR 124 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 March 2001
The EAT has ruled, in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v Vento, that evidence of the treatment afforded to comparators in similar, even if not the same situations, can be relied upon as evidence of how a hypothetical comparator would have been treated.
-
expand
Chindove v William Morrison Supermarkets plc EAT/0201/13 & EAT/0043/14
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 4 July 2014
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that when determining whether or not an employee has accepted an employer's fundamental breach of his or her contract of employment and therefore lost his or her right to resign and claim constructive dismissal, the passage of time between the breach and the employee's subsequent resignation is only one factor that must be considered.
-
expand
Chohan v Derby Law Centre [2004] IRLR 685 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Choksi v Royal Mail Group Ltd EAT/0280/15
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Chondol v Liverpool City Council EAT/0298/08
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 11 May 2009
In Chondol v Liverpool City Council EAT/0298/08, the EAT held that the employment tribunal was correct to draw a distinction between the employee's religious beliefs on the one hand and inappropriate promotion of those beliefs on the other. Since the employer would have reacted in the same way irrespective of the view (religious or otherwise) that was being promoted, the employee had not been treated less favourably on grounds of his religion or belief.
-
expand
Christou and another v London Borough of Haringey [2013] IRLR 379 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Christou and Ward v London Borough of Haringey EAT/0298/11 and EAT/0299/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
City and County of Swansea v Gayle [2013] IRLR 768 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 2013
Joe Beeston, Kate Edminson, Rosie Kight and David Rintoul are associate solicitors and Iain Naylor is a trainee solicitor at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
City Facilities Management (UK) Ltd v Ling EAT/0396/13
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
City of Edinburgh Council v Dickson EATS/0038/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 2010
In City of Edinburgh Council v Dickson EATS/0038/09, the EAT upheld the employment tribunal's decision that an employee whose employer failed properly to consider his explanation that he had behaved out of character during a hypoglycaemic episode was unfairly dismissed. However, the tribunal's conclusion that the employer's rejection of that explanation amounted to direct and disability-related discrimination was wrong in law and was overturned.