In Chronos Richardson Ltd v Watson, the EAT holds that the majority of an employment tribunal erred in law by substituting its own view for that of the reasonable employer, when it failed to apply the "band of reasonable responses" test and, instead, undertook an over-detailed analysis of a selection system used by an employer in making redundancies, including picking away at individual aspects of it and criticising individual markings awarded.
The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.
Reed Business Information Limited trading as XpertHR is an Appointed Representative of Abbey Protection Group Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.