Health & Safety Executive v Cadman  IRLR 29 EAT
Reports relating to this case:
- 5 March 2004
In Health & Safety Executive v Cadman, the EAT holds that, where a woman claims equal pay on the basis that she is paid less than her longer-serving male comparators doing work rated as equivalent, the employer is not required to produce specific justification for using length of service as a pay criterion in circumstances where it was distinguishing between full-time workers.
- 1 January 2004
In Health and Safety Executive v Cadman (22 October 2003), the EAT holds that length of service as a criterion in a pay system did not require specific justification so as to establish a genuine material factor defence to an equal pay claim, as length of service was generally objectively justified.
- 18 November 2003
Case round-up from Eversheds, covering: indirectly discriminatory pay schemes; and agreeing to a reduced tribunal panel.