James v Bank of England EAT/226/94

Reports relating to this case:

  • Sex discrimination: Suit requirement not discriminatory

    Date:
    1 August 1994

    An employer's dress code which required men to wear a suit, but gave women a much wider choice of clothing, did not give rise to any sex discrimination against men. This finding by an industrial tribunal disclosed no error of law, holds the EAT in James v Bank of England.