Kirton v Tetrosyl Ltd  IRLR 353 CA
Reports relating to this case:
Disability discrimination: Individual with asymptomatic cancer "disabled" when treatment caused impairment
- 18 July 2003
In Kirton v Tetrosyl Ltd, the Court of Appeal holds that an individual suffering from urinary incontinence - not of itself a substantive "impairment" within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - is nonetheless disabled under that Act where the incontinence was caused by surgery conducted as a standard treatment for the progressive condition of asymptomatic cancer.
- 1 June 2003
This month's case round-up in brief.
- 13 May 2003
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering: employers' liability for harassment by a third party; and disability discrimination.