-
expand
Peninsula Business Service Ltd v Baker [2017] IRLR 394 EAT
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 October 2017
In Peninsula Business Service Ltd v Baker [2017] IRLR 394 EAT, the EAT held that, for a claim of harassment to succeed in a case involving the protected characteristic of disability, it is not enough for the alleged harassment to be "related to" disability in a general sense. The claimant must actually have a disability to bring the claim.
-
- Date:
- 9 March 2017
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employee could not claim for harassment on the ground of disability where he had not proved, but merely asserted, that he has a disability.
-
expand
Peninsula Business Services Ltd v Sweeney [2004] IRLR 49 EAT
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 November 2005
A round-up of developments in the implied duty of confidentiality and express contractual terms on confidential information and restraints on competition.
-
- Date:
- 20 February 2004
In Peninsula Business Services Ltd v Sweeney the EAT holds that a sales executive's contract of employment incorporated the rules governing the employer's commission scheme, which specified that no payments of commission would be made if the employee was no longer in the employment at the date the commission would have been payable. Those rules were clearly set out in a written document that was specifically referred to as forming part of the contract, and which had been signed by the employee.
-
expand
Pepper (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Hart and others [1993] IRLR 33 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 1993
In Pepper (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Hart and others [1993] IRLR 33 HL, the House of Lords held that in-house benefits, and particularly concessionary school fees for teachers' children, should be assessed for tax on the basis of the additional or marginal cost to the employer of providing the benefit.
-
expand
Percy v Church of Scotland Board of National Mission [2006] IRLR 195 HL
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA [2009] IRLR 959 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 23 November 2009
In Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA [2009] IRLR 959 ECJ, the ECJ held that art.7(1) of the Working Time Directive must be interpreted as precluding national provisions or collective agreements that deny a worker who is on sick leave during a period of scheduled annual leave the right to take the annual leave at a later time, even if this is outside the holiday year in which the annual leave was accrued.
-
expand
Peregrine v Peacock Stores and others EAT/0315/13
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Pereira de Souza v Vinci Construction (UK) Ltd [2017] IRLR 844 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Pereira v The Post Office [1994] IT/18088/94
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 March 1995
In Pereira v The Post Office, a Southampton industrial tribunal rules that the Post Office, which had properly followed "full procedures", was not liable for the racial abuse suffered by an employee from a fellow employee. However, in Cooley v BRS Ltd, a Reading industrial tribunal rules that BRS had failed to properly implement its harassment policy and was liable for the racial abuse of one employee by another.
-
expand
Perez v Ayuntamiento de Oviedo Case C-416/13 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 February 2015
Carly Mather is a managing associate, Gerri Hurst and Lucy Sorrell are associates, Mona Jackson is a trainee solicitor and Richard Branson is a paralegal at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Perkin v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust [2005] IRLR 934 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 December 2005
In Perkin v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal was entitled to make a 100% reduction to the compensation of a senior executive whose dismissal was procedurally unfair, on the basis that his conduct at the disciplinary hearing was such that it destroyed any possibility of him working with senior colleagues in the future.