-
expand
R (on the application of Shoesmith) v Ofsted and others [2010] EWHC 852 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 June 2010
Helen Samuel, associate solicitor and Anna Bridges, associate solicitor, at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.
-
expand
R (on the application of Shoesmith) v Ofsted and others [2011] IRLR 679 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 2 June 2011
The Court of Appeal has held that the summary dismissal of Sharon Shoesmith, during the fallout from the death of "Baby P", was unlawful. In finding that she was entitled to a decision on her judicial review application, the Court held that her alternative employment tribunal remedy was not "equally convenient and effective".
-
expand
R (on the application of T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester and others [2013] EWCA Civ 25 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
R (on the application of T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester and others [2014] UKSC 35 SC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 25 June 2014
The Supreme Court has held that the requirement in criminal record checks to disclose all convictions and cautions, including those given for minor offences and crimes committed as a child, breaches the European Convention on Human Rights.
-
expand
R (on the application of the Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform [2009] IRLR 373 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 5 March 2009
The European Court of Justice has held that the UK legislation permitting employers to dismiss employees aged 65 or over if the reason for dismissal is retirement can, in principle, be justified under the Framework Directive.
-
expand
R (on the application of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain) v Central Arbitration Committee and Roofoods Ltd (t/a Deliveroo) [2019] IRLR 249 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
R (on the application of the Independent Workers' Union of Great Britain) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and another [2021] IRLR 102 HC
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
R (on the application of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee [2005] IRLR 641 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] IRLR 911 SC
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2017
In R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] IRLR 911 SC, the Supreme Court held that the requirement for claimants to pay a fee to bring an employment tribunal claim is unlawful and that the legislation that introduced the fees must be quashed.
-
- Date:
- 26 July 2017
The Supreme Court has held that the requirement for claimants to pay a fee to bring an employment tribunal claim is unlawful and that the legislation that introduced employment tribunal fees must be quashed.
-
expand
R (on the applications of P and A) v Secretary of State for Justice and others [2016] EWHC 89 HC
(1 report relating to this case)