-
expand
Schwarzenbach t/a Thames-Side Court Estate v Jones EAT/0100/15
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Science Warehouse Ltd v Mills [2016] IRLR 96 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 27 January 2016
Amanda Steadman is a professional support lawyer, Iain Naylor, Lucy Sorell and Rachael Wake are associates, and Jessica-Alice Curtis is a trainee solicitor at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Scope v Thornett [2007] IRLR 155 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Scotch Premier Meat Ltd v Burns and others [2000] IRLR 639 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 September 2000
In Scotch Premier Meat Ltd v Burns and others [2000] IRLR 639 EAT, the EAT held that an employment tribunal had not erred in holding that the employers were "proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees" within the meaning of s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act, notwithstanding that, as an alternative option, they were considering selling the business as a going concern.
-
expand
Scott v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [2004] IRLR 713 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 12 November 2004
In Scott v Commissioners of Inland Revenue the Court of Appeal holds that an employment tribunal erred in awarding only £15,000 in respect of the psychiatric injury caused to an employee by the way in which his employer dealt with allegations of sexual harassment made against him by a work colleague.
-
expand
Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 2001
In Scott v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] EWCA Civ 2005 CA, the Court of Appeal held that an employment tribunal was wrong to infer knowledge of a protected act on the part of three councillors who had decided not to offer a job to the claimant, and therefore to find victimisation, since knowledge on the part of the alleged discriminator of the protected act is a pre-condition to a finding of victimisation.
-
expand
Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright [2003] IRLR 21 CS
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 21 March 2003
In Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright the Court of Session upholds the EAT's decision that a "nightwatchman" who was required to be on his employer's premises for 14 hours each night was entitled to be paid the national minimum wage in respect of all those hours, even though, while required to respond to an alarm at any time, he only had to undertake specific tasks that took around four hours a night, and was permitted to sleep if he chose to when not carrying out those tasks.
-
expand
Scotthorne v Four Seasons Conservatories (UK) Ltd EAT/0178/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 August 2010
Ceri Hughes, David Parry, and Carly Mather, associates at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.
-
expand
Scottish and Southern Energy plc v Mackay EATS/0075/06
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 December 2007
In Scottish and Southern Energy plc v Mackay EATS/0075/06, the EAT held that failure by an employer to consult directly with a disabled employee about the possibility of his taking up less-stressful alternative work rendered the employee's subsequent dismissal unfair, but did not in itself amount to a failure by the employer to make reasonable adjustments.
-
expand
Scotts Company (UK) Ltd v Budd [2003] IRLR 145 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 4 April 2003
In Scotts Company (UK) Ltd v Budd, the EAT holds that an employee who had exhausted his contractual entitlement to sick pay, and had remained on unpaid sick leave for a year before he was dismissed, was not entitled to a week's pay for each week of his statutory minimum notice period.