-
expand
Teinaz v London Borough of Wandsworth [2002] IRLR 721 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Tesco Stores Ltd v Pook and others [2004] IRLR 618 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 22 October 2004
In Tesco Stores Ltd v Pook the High Court holds that that a secret receipt of payment through fraudulent invoices by a senior employee, as a bribe from a company doing business with his employer, gave rise to a conflict of interest and was tantamount to a secret commission.
-
expand
Thaine v London School of Economics EAT/0144/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Thames Water Utilities v Reynolds [1996] IRLR 186 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 April 1996
In Thames Water Utilities v Reynolds, the EAT holds that the Apportionment Act 1870 applied to the computation of a day's annual holiday pay to which an employee was contractually entitled on termination of his employment, and that the meaning of "a day" for these purposes is a calendar day rather than a working day.
-
expand
The Bakers' Union v Clarks of Hove Ltd [1978] IRLR 366 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 August 1978
In The Bakers' Union v Clarks of Hove Ltd [1978] IRLR 366 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the EAT had incorrectly set aside the finding by the Industrial Tribunal that the employers' insolvency was not a special circumstance rendering it not reasonably practicable for them to comply with the redundancy consultation provisions of the Employment Protection Act, section 99.
-
expand
The British Waterways Board (t/a Scottish Canals) v Smith EAT/0004/15
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
The City of Oxford Bus Services Ltd t/a Oxford Bus Company v Harvey EAT/0171/18
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 20 March 2019
In The City of Oxford Bus Services Ltd t/a Oxford Bus Company v Harvey, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that, when deciding if an employer's working arrangements are justified, the tribunal must focus on justifying the rule in the particular circumstances of the business, rather than the application of the rule to the individual.
-
expand
The County Council of Avon v Howlett [1983] IRLR 171 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 22 February 1983
Where an employer has mistakenly overpaid an employee, the money can be recovered if it was paid because of a mistake of fact. However in a warning to employers operating computerised payment systems, the Court of Appeal in The County Council of Avon v Howlett holds that the defence of estoppel may operate to prevent recovery of all the money even if the employee has spent only some of it.
-
expand
The Home Office v Holmes [1984] IRLR 299 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
The Manchester College v Hazel and another [2013] IRLR 563 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 July 2013
David Malamatenios is a partner, and Colin Makin, Krishna Santra, Sandra Martins and Melissa Powys-Rodrigues are solicitors at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.