Conventional appearance rule not discriminatory
-
expand
Smith v Safeway plc [1996] IRLR 456 CA (1 other report)
In Smith v Safeway plc (16 February 1996) EOR69A, the Court of Appeal holds that an appearance code which applies a standard of what is conventional applies an even-handed approach between men and women, and not one which is sex discriminatory.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
