This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

GOQ limitation does not apply to start-up

This report relates to 1 case(s)

  • expand

    Lasertop Ltd v Webster [1997] IRLR 498 EAT (2 other reports)

    • Gap in SDA

      Date:
      1 September 1997

      In Lasertop Ltd v Webster (11 April 1997) EOR75E, the EAT holds that an important limitation on the genuine occupational qualification exception to the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 does not operate in respect of recruitment for a start-up business.

    • Sex discrimination: "Genuine occupational qualification" defence upheld

      Date:
      1 July 1997

      The sex discrimination complaint of a man who, when he applied for employment at a women's health club was told that only female staff would be employed, was not well-founded, holds the EAT in Lasertop Ltd v Webster.

The limitation on the genuine occupational qualification exception (GOQ) to the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, where the employer has existing employees who can be employed on the relevant duties, does not operate in respect of recruitment for a start-up business, according to the EAT in Lasertop Ltd v Webster.

Mr Webster replied to a newspaper advertisement for sales/ trainee manager posts in respect of a women-only club which was due to open. However, he was told over the telephone that the jobs were for women only.