This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Indirect discrimination: no need for claimants to explain why they are disadvantaged

This report relates to 1 case(s)

  • expand disabled

    Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] IRLR 558 SC (0 other reports)

Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] IRLR 558 SC

indirect discrimination | adverse impact | particular disadvantage

The Supreme Court has held that claimants in indirect discrimination claims are not required to explain why the provision, criterion or practice (PCP) puts, or would put, the affected group at a particular disadvantage.