Part-time workers: Less favourable treatment does not have to be solely on grounds of part-time status
This report relates to 1 case(s)
Carl v University of Sheffield  IRLR 616 EAT (1 other report)
In Carl v University of Sheffield  IRLR 616 EAT, the EAT held that a part-time worker complaining of less favourable treatment does not have to show that the treatment was solely on the ground of his or her part-time status. The EAT also held that the comparison must be with an actual, not a hypothetical, comparator.