Pell v Wagstaff and Wheatley Hotel
-
expand disabled
Pell v Wagstaff and Wheatley Hotel [2000] ET/2801882/99 (0 other reports)
In Pell v Wagstaff and Wheatley Hotel [2000] ET/2801882/99, an employment tribunal found that Mr Pell had been less favourably treated on the grounds of his sex when he was turned down for a job because he refused to cut his long hair.
Mr Pell had long hair, which he wore tied back so that it fell as a ponytail.
To continue reading, register for free access now.
Register now
Already a Brightmine HR and Compliance Centre user?
Log in
