Sex discrimination: Vulgar remarks were sexist although they were also made to men
This report relates to 1 case(s)
In Driskel v Peninsula Business Services Ltd and others  IRLR 151, the EAT holds that a woman in the unenviable position of having to seek promotion by way of a one-to-one interview with a man for whom she had an antipathy was subjected to remarks from him which, in an appalling fashion, sought to exploit the situation by reference to the sex of, respectively, interviewee and interviewer. By those remarks, whether they were flippant or not, he undermined her dignity as a woman when, being heterosexual, he would never similarly have treated a man; his comments to men were vulgar without being intimidatory. Given the nature of the remarks, the fact that she did not complain immediately was not significant.