-
- Type:
- FAQs
-
- Date:
- 22 July 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers garden leave.
-
- Date:
- 1 April 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case of the week, provided by DLA Piper, covers varying contracts of employment.
-
- Date:
- 27 February 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This article looks at some of the important judgments in the area of the transfer of undertakings over the past year.
-
- Date:
- 11 January 2008
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Jackson v Computershare Investor Services plc [2007] EWCA Civ 1065, the Court of Appeal ruled that the provision in the TUPE Regulations to the effect that a transferred contract of employment will have effect after the transfer as if originally made between the employee and the transferee could not be construed so as to give the employee a contractual benefit to which she had not been entitled under her original contract.
-
- Date:
- 8 August 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Przybylska v Modus Telecom Ltd EAT/0566/06 the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a tribunal was wrong to imply into a contract a term that the employer could carry out a review of the probationary period within a reasonable time of the expiry of the probationary period.
-
- Date:
- 11 July 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Millam v The Print Factory (London) 1991 Ltd [2007] IRLR 526 CA, the Court of Appeal held that where the operation - as opposed to the ownership of a business - transferred to a new owner, TUPE applied notwithstanding that the business was acquired on a sale of shares.
-
- Date:
- 3 July 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case of the week, provided by Addleshaw Goddard, covers discretionary bonuses.
-
- Date:
- 6 March 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
This week's case of the week, provided by Lovells, covers restrictive covenants.
-
- Date:
- 12 January 2007
- Type:
- Employment law cases
In Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard and others [2007] IRLR 126 CA, the Court of Appeal has held that it was not a breach of contract or any fiduciary duties when an employee failed to inform his employer that he was taking preparatory steps to develop a product that was intended, following his resignation, to be marketed in competition with the employer.