Tribunal forms

New and updated

  • ET3

    Type:
    Employment glossary

    Definition from the XpertHR glossary.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 December 2011
    Type:
    Law reports

    Tori O'Neil, Tessa Harland, Sarah Wade and Ed Gregory are associates at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 May 2011
    Type:
    Law reports

    Joanne Magill, associate, and Claire Benson and Ceri Hughes, managing associates, at Addleshaw Goddard detail the latest rulings.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 April 2011
    Type:
    Law reports

    Rebekah Martin, Carly Mather, Kate Edminson and James Buckley, all associates at Addleshaw Goddard, detail the latest rulings.

  • How to respond to an employment tribunal claim

    Type:
    How to

    Practical guidance on responding to an employment tribunal claim, including the 28-day time limit for submitting the ET3; grounds for resisting the claim; pleading in the alternative; and counterclaims.

  • Employment tribunals: Extent of duty to place details of tribunal claims in public domain

    Date:
    15 August 2000
    Type:
    Law reports

    In R v Secretary of the Central Office of the Employment Tribunals, ex parte Public Concern at Work, the High Court concludes that the particulars of an originating application (IT1) that the Secretary is generally required to enter in the public register must include: the applicant's and the respondent's names; the date the application was made and received; the relief sought; and a summary of each of the grounds of the claim sufficient to enable a member of the public exercising the right of inspection to identify the gist of those grounds.

  • Points of procedure 1: Time limits, directions and settlement

    Date:
    15 March 2000
    Type:
    Law reports

    This is the first of two articles rounding up recent case law on employment tribunal and EAT practice and procedure.

  • Discrimination complaint need only specify minimum particulars

    Date:
    1 January 1988
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Dodd v British Telecom plc (12.3.87) EOR17B, the EAT rules that a discrimination complaint is "presented", so as to stop the time limit from running, when it is received by the industrial tribunal and that in order to be a valid complaint the originating application need only be in writing, contain sufficient to identify who is making it and against whom it is made, and contain sufficient to show what sort of complaint.

  • Originating application does not have to make prima facie equal value case

    Date:
    1 March 1987
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Dennehy v Sealink UK Ltd (21.11.86) EOR12B, the EAT rules that an originating application does not have to disclose a prima facie case that a complainant is employed on work of equal value with her comparator.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to employment tribunal forms.