Service provision change

Latest items in Service provision change

  • Employment law manual updates: TUPE

    Date:
    1 December 2016
    Type:
    Editor's choice

    The TUPE section of the Employment law manual has been updated to include information on cases relating to the standard definition of a TUPE transfer and the extended definition (also known as a service provision change).

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 November 2016
    Type:
    Law reports

    Chris Cook is partner and head of employment and Keely Rushmore is senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 September 2016
    Type:
    Law reports

    Chris Cook is partner and head of employment and Keely Rushmore is senior associate at SA Law. They round up the latest rulings.

  • TUPE case confirms obligations apply to multiple providers

    Date:
    15 June 2016
    Type:
    Law reports

    TUPE transferee obligations can apply where a service changing hands is divided among multiple providers on functional lines, explains Dr John McMullen in his latest update.

  • TUPE service provision change: lay off does not prevent organised group of employees

    Date:
    28 January 2016
    Type:
    Law reports

    Laying off employees before a service provision change does not necessarily prevent them from transferring to the new employer under TUPE. Lindsay Macdonald reports on a recent case at the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    27 January 2016
    Type:
    Law reports

    Amanda Steadman is a professional support lawyer, Iain Naylor, Lucy Sorell and Rachael Wake are associates, and Jessica-Alice Curtis is a trainee solicitor at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.

  • TUPE transfers: employee on indefinite sick leave not transferred

    Date:
    10 September 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    An Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employee, not working in his employer's business because of health problems, but retained as an employee to receive permanent health insurance (PHI) payments, was not "assigned" to the organised grouping of employees for the purposes of a TUPE transfer.

  • TUPE: A third party cannot dictate whether or not an employee is "assigned"

    Date:
    2 September 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    A recent ruling in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) gives clarity about when an employee is "assigned" to an employer before a TUPE transfer. In his latest TUPE update, Dr John McMullen explains the ruling's implications for employers.

  • Case round-up

    Date:
    1 May 2015
    Type:
    Law reports

    David Malamatenios is a partner, Colin Makin, Sandra Martins and Krishna Santra are senior associates, and Hinal Raichura is a trainee at Colman Coyle Solicitors. They round up the latest rulings.

  • Does TUPE apply where an outsourcing contract comes to an end and a new contractor is engaged?

    Type:
    FAQs

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to TUPE in connection with service provision changes.