Victimisation

New and updated

  • Race discrimination: Victimisation and the reverse burden of proof

    Date:
    14 July 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Oyarce v Cheshire County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 434, the Court of Appeal held that the reverse burden of proof does not apply to race victimisation claims.

  • HM Prison Service and others v Ibimidun; Ibimidun v HM Prison Service and others

    Date:
    10 July 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that an employee who was dismissed when he brought tribunal proceedings in order to harass his employer, rather than to receive compensation, was not protected by the victimisation provisions of the Race Relations Act 1976.

  • Bayode v The Chief Constable Of Derbyshire

    Date:
    12 June 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the act of making a written record can not in itself amount to a detriment under race discrimination legislation.

  • Case of the week: Court finds for an employer in victimisation case

    Date:
    3 June 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    This week's case of the week, provided by Addleshaw Goddard, covers victimisation.

  • Oyarce v Cheshire County Council

    Date:
    12 May 2008
    Type:
    Law reports

    The Court of Appeal has agreed with the Employment Appeal Tribunal that the reverse burden of proof does not apply in race victimisation cases.

  • British Medical Association v Chaudhary

    Date:
    7 August 2007
    Type:
    Law reports

    In British Medical Association v Chaudhary [2007] EWCA Civ 788 CA, the Court of Appeal has overturned a decision awarding £814,877 to a surgeon who claimed that the British Medical Association (BMA) had discriminated against him by failing to support his race discrimination claims against regulatory medical bodies.

  • Oyarce v Cheshire County Council

    Date:
    20 July 2007
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Oyarce v Cheshire County Council EAT/0557/06, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has held that the reverse burden of proof does not apply in race victimisation cases.

  • Case of the week: When can the 'without prejudice' rule be set aside?

    Date:
    12 June 2007
    Type:
    Law reports

    This week's case of the week, provided by Addleshaw Goddard, covers 'without prejudice' communications.

  • Case digest

    Date:
    1 December 2006
    Type:
    Law reports

    Tina McKevitt, lecturer in employment law at University of Sheffield, provides a round-up of employment tribunal decisions on discrimination.

  • Brunel University and another v Vaseghi and another

    Date:
    23 October 2006
    Type:
    Law reports

    In Brunel University and another v Vaseghi and another EAT/0307/06, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that the need to get to the truth in discrimination cases can override the rule that prevents settlement discussions between parties' representatives from being admissible as evidence.

About this topic

HR and legal information and guidance relating to race-related victimisation.