Tribunal update: Law firm's mandatory retirement age of 65 for partners was justified

XpertHR provides a summary of an interesting recent employment tribunal ruling in which:

• an age discrimination case that went to the Supreme Court returned to the employment tribunal for it to consider whether or not a law firm's retirement age for partners of 65 was justified. 

Also

In the employment tribunals Access the XpertHR archive of tribunal decisions, as well as longer round-ups of cases on a particular topic. 

Employment tribunal decisions 27.05.13 to 02.06.13 A round-up of links to stories about employment tribunal rulings reported in the week beginning 27 May 2013, during which a tribunal brought to a conclusion the long-running retirement case Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes by applying Supreme Court guidance and deciding that a requirement for a law firm's partners to step down at 65 was justified.