-
expand
Martin and others v South Bank University [2004] IRLR 74 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2011
In Martin v Devonshires Solicitors EAT/0086/10, the EAT held that, where an employer dismisses an employee in response to his or her protected act, the employer may not have unlawfully victimised the employee where the reason for the dismissal was some feature of the protected act that can be treated as separable.
-
expand
Martin v Microgen Wealth Management Systems Ltd EAT/0505/06
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Martin v SS Photay & Associates [2007] ET/1100242/07
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 24 December 2007
A review of a number of recent employment tribunal decisions suggests that some employers remain unaware of the implications of, or are struggling with, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1031), which became law on 1 October 2006. The decisions also demonstrate the approach that the tribunals might take to the question of justification of discrimination and to the assessment of injury to feelings compensation.
-
expand
Martin v Yeomen Aggregates Ltd [1983] IRLR 49 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 8 February 1983
Whether or not words of dismissal uttered in the heat of the moment can be retracted quickly has in the past been left undecided by the Court of Appeal and the EAT. In Martin v Yeomen Aggregates Ltd the EAT, in a rather unsatisfactory judgment, appears to hold that immediate retraction of a summary dismissal is possible in law.
-
expand
Martins v Marks & Spencer plc [1998] IRLR 326 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt Der Deutschen Bühnen [2008] IRLR 450 ECJ
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2008
A recent decision of the European Court of Justice may result in the UK having to amend its sexual orientation laws in relation to pensions. Although the main points at issue in the case are already covered by legislation in the UK, the application of the Barber temporal restriction may have an impact on public sector schemes.
-
expand
Masini v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd ET/2701121/2014
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co [1978] IRLR 31 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 January 1978
In Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co [1978] IRLR 31 CA, the Court of Appeal held that, whilst the parties to a contract cannot alter the truth of their relationship by putting a different label upon it, when it is ambiguous as to whether the employment is under a contract of employment or a contract for services, the terms of an agreement between the parties may be decisive as to what is the legal relationship.
-
expand
Mather v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police ET/242762/2013, ET/2409037/2013 & ET/2409239/2013
(1 report relating to this case)