-
expand
Screene v Seatwave EAT/0020/11
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Seawell Ltd v Ceva Freight (UK) Ltd and another [2012] IRLR 802 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Secretary Of State For Business, Enterprise And Regulatory Reform v Neufeld and another [2009] IRLR 475 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Knight [2014] IRLR 605 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Secretary of State for Employment v ASLEF (No 2) [1972] 2 All ER 949 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 31 December 1972
In Secretary of State for Employment v ASLEF (No 2) [1972] 2 All ER 949 CA, the Court of Appeal held that works rules or job descriptions are not of themselves contractual. They are guides as to the way in which work should be performed and should be interpreted in a reasonable way. If interpreted in an unreasonable way in order to disrupt employment this will be breach of contract.
-
expand
Secretary of State for Justice (sued as National Offenders Management Service) v Bowling [2012] IRLR 382 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 February 2012
Chris McAvoy, Sarah Wade, David Rintoul, Helen Corbett and Kristin Aarvik are associate solicitors at Addleshaw Goddard LLP. They round up the latest rulings.
-
expand
Secretary of State for Justice v Betts and others [2017] IRLR 804 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Secretary of State for Justice v MacDonald Heaney EAT/0401/10
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2011
Joanne Magill, associate, and Claire Benson and Ceri Hughes, managing associates, at Addleshaw Goddard detail the latest rulings.
-
expand
Secretary of State for Justice v Mansfield EAT/0539/09
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Secretary of State for Scotland v Taylor [1997] IRLR 608 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 November 1997
An employer did not act in fundamental breach of an employee's contract of employment when it required him to retire at the age of 55, in accordance with its retirement policy aimed at achieving a younger workforce, even though the contract incorporated an equal opportunities policy containing an express commitment to offer equal opportunities regardless of age, rules the EAT in Secretary of State for Scotland v Taylor.