Law reports

Precedent-setting cases from the EAT and appellate courts, along with reports of selected tribunal cases.

This tool will help you:

Stay up to date with developments in case law.
Keep informed about the situations that have led to employment tribunal claims.

Browse by case title

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Search by case title

Stop press

Decisions
Cases on Appeal

EAT rules that implied term prevented dismissal of employee with long-term disability cover

In Awan v ICTS UK Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an implied term of the contract of employment prohibited the employer from dismissing the employee for medical capability while he was entitled to receive long-term disability benefits.
Disability discrimination: Dismissal of shoplifting employee with tendency to steal

Date:

29 November 2018

In Wood v Durham County Council, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the employee's tendency to steal was a manifestation of his disability and an excluded condition under the Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations 2010.
Redundancy: Failure to fulfil contractual obligation to offer trial period for alternative role

Date:

23 November 2018

In George v London Borough of Brent, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the employer's failure to comply with a contractual obligation to offer a redundant employee a trial period for a possible alternative role was likely to render the dismissal unfair.
Employment status: Private hire drivers were workers, rules EAT

Date:

22 November 2018

In Addison Lee Ltd v Lange and others, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that drivers who worked within the employer's private hire business were workers rather than self-employed.
Part-time working: 50% pay for 53.5% of full-time hours was less favourable treatment

Date:

21 November 2018

In British Airways plc v Pinaud, the Court of Appeal held that a part-time worker's contract requiring her to be available for work 53.5% of the time that a full-time comparator was required to be available for work constituted less favourable treatment because she was paid only 50% of the full-time salary.

You said it...

I would certainly recommend XpertHR for its up-to-date legal information and ability to make one’s life much easier at the click of a button.

Rebecca Lomas, HR administrator, Nielsen UK

Trending

The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.

View our privacy policy, cookie policy and supported browsers.