-
expand
Diocese of Southwark v Coker [1996] ICR 896 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Duke v Martin Retail Group plc EAT/647/92
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 May 1994
The EAT holds in Duke v Martin Retail Group plc that despite the high degree of control exercised by the company, the overall effect of a shop manager's contract, under which he had day-to-day control of the running of the business and responsibility for the employment and payment of his own staff, pointed to him being an independent contractor rather than an employee.
-
expand
Eaton v (1) Robert Eaton Ltd and (2) Secretary of State for Employment [1988] IRLR 83 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 1 March 1988
In Eaton v Robert Eaton Ltd and Secretary of State for Employment [1988] IRLR 83 EAT, the EAT held that the Industrial Tribunal had not erred in law in holding that the appellant managing director was not an employee of the respondent company and, therefore, was not entitled to a redundancy payment when the company ceased trading.
-
expand
Esso Petroleum Company v (1) Jarvis and others (2) Brentvine Ltd EAT/0831/00
(2 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 9 December 2002
The EAT holds in Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v (1) Jarvis and others (2) Brentvine Ltd that an employment tribunal which expressly found that there was no contract, either written or oral, between a client company and a worker supplied to it by an employment agency, erred in law in going on to rule that the existence of factors consistent with a contract of employment subsisting, and the fact that the worker had worked continuously for the client company for nine years, made her an employee of the client company.
-
- Date:
- 14 May 2002
Even if the company is not the employer, potential liabilities can remain when taking on staff through an employment agency.
-
expand
Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton [1999] IRLR 367 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
F&G Cleaners Ltd v Saddington and others [2012] IRLR 892 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Fleming v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1997] IRLR 682 CS
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Flett v Matheson [2005] IRLR 412 EAT
(1 report relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 15 July 2005
In Flett v Matheson, the EAT holds that the employment tribunal had correctly found that the employee was not employed under a traditional fixed-term contract of apprenticeship as his training period involved a tripartite agreement between the employer, employee and a training provider.
-
expand
Flett v Matheson [2006] IRLR 277 CA
(1 report relating to this case)
-
expand
Franks v Reuters Ltd and another [2003] IRLR 423 CA
(3 reports relating to this case)
-
- Date:
- 18 July 2003
In Franks v Reuters Ltd and another, the Court of Appeal holds that in determining an individual's employment status, an employment tribunal should consider, not only any relevant documents, but also all the relevant evidence about the dynamics of the work relationship between the parties, and make clear and comprehensive findings of fact on this evidence.
-
- Date:
- 1 May 2003
Court of Appeal decision makes it clear that companies could be liable to be taken to tribunal if temporary workers can claim there is an implied employment contract.
-
- Date:
- 29 April 2003
This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering: employment status of temporary staff; and incorporation of holiday pay.