This is a preview. To continue reading, register for free access now. Register now or Log in

Brunel University and another v Vaseghi and another

This report relates to 1 case(s)

admissibility of evidence | settlement discussions | without prejudice

In Brunel University and another v Vaseghi and another EAT/0307/06, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that the need to get to the truth in discrimination cases can override the rule that prevents settlement discussions between parties' representatives from being admissible as evidence.

Professor Vaseghi brought a race discrimination claim.