In Airbus UK Ltd v Webb  IRLR 309, the Court of Appeal held that Diosynth Ltd v Thomson did not establish a rule of law that spent warnings must be ignored for all purposes. On the facts, where a spent warning was not part of the reason for the dismissal, but the basis for the employer's refusal to exercise leniency in respect of later gross misconduct, neither Diosynth nor the wording of s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 rendered the dismissal necessarily unfair.
This week's case of the week, provided by
Addleshaw Goddard, covers expired disciplinary warnings.
Discover the power of XpertHR employment law guidance and best practice at your fingertips. Explore thousands of up-to-date resources that will help you increase your productivity, build your confidence in HR decisions and deliver on your business strategies.
The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.
LNRS Data Services Limited trading as XpertHR is an Appointed Representative of Markel International Insurance Company Limited trading as Markel Legal Expenses Insurance which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.