Law reports

This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Case round-up: constructive dismissal claims; and discriminatory dress codes

This report relates to 2 case(s)

expand disabled
Billington v Michael Hunter & Sons Ltd EAT/0578/03 (0 other reports)
expand
Department for Work and Pensions v Thompson [2004] IRLR 348 EAT (2 other reports)
- Department for Work and Pensions v Thompson
  
  Date:
  
  1 June 2004
  
  In Department for Work and Pensions v Thompson [2004] IRLR 348 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a workplace dress code that requires men to wear a collar and tie and women to dress appropriately to a similar standard may not be discriminatory on the grounds of sex.
- EAT gets shirty with Jobcentre
  
  Date:
  
  1 February 2004
  
  A legal ruling that decided a man working for Jobcentre Plus had been treated less favourably because he was required to wear a collar and tie to work has been overturned after an appeal.

This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering: constructive dismissal claims; and discriminatory dress codes.

Read more items tagged with the same topics

Manage your tracked topics>

About this resource

Published date: 20 January 2004
Publisher: RBI
Source: Personnel Today

Explore XpertHR

Learn more

Customers

Get in touch

Connect with us

The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.

View our privacy policy, cookie policy and supported browsers.