Law reports

Go to section

This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Case round-up: costs orders for unreasonable behaviour; and gross misconduct dismissals

This report relates to 2 case(s)

expand
McPherson v BNP Paribas (London branch) [2004] IRLR 558 CA (1 other report)
- Points of procedure
  
  Date:
  
  26 November 2004
  
  A review of recent significant cases on practice and procedure in the employment tribunals, EAT and Court of Appeal.
expand
X v Y [2004] IRLR 625 CA (2 other reports)
- Employers must be reasonable about impact on human rights
  
  Date:
  
  26 April 2005
  
  Employers can win claims of breaches in human rights if they show they took justified and proportionate steps.
- X v Y
  
  Date:
  
  1 August 2004
  
  In X v Y [2004] IRLR 625 CA, the Court of Appeal held that the applicant had been fairly dismissed from his job working with youth offenders after he had been cautioned for gross indecency with another man in a public toilet and failed to disclose the fact that he had committed a criminal offence to his employers.

This week's case round-up from Eversheds, looking at: costs orders for unreasonable behaviour; and gross misconduct dismissals.

Unreasonable behaviour triggers costs award

McPherson v BNP Paribas (London Branch), CA, 13 May 2004 EWCACiv 569z

Read more items tagged with the same topics

Manage your tracked topics>

About this resource

Published date: 22 June 2004
Publisher: RBI
Source: Personnel Today

Explore XpertHR

Learn more

Customers

Get in touch

Connect with us

The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.

View our privacy policy, cookie policy and supported browsers.