Law reports

Go to section

This is a preview. To continue reading please log in or Register to read this article

Case round-up: Unfair dismissal compensation and TUPE consultation procedures

This report relates to 2 case(s)

expand
Howard v Millrise Ltd t/a Colourflow (in liquidation) and another [2005] IRLR 84 EAT (1 other report)
- Transfer of undertakings: Duty to invite elections
  
  Date:
  
  14 January 2005
  
  In Howard v (1) Millrise Ltd and another, the EAT holds that the correct interpretation of reg.10 (8A) of TUPE is that, if there is no trade union and no elected employee representatives, the employer is under a duty to inform and consult employees affected by the transfer of the undertaking.
expand
Orthet Ltd v Vince-Cain [2004] IRLR 857 EAT (1 other report)
- Sex discrimination: No tax on injury to feelings award
  
  Date:
  
  10 December 2004
  
  In Orthet Ltd v Vince-Cain, the EAT holds that there is no authority that supports the proposition that an award for injury to feelings is taxable.

This week's case round-up from Eversheds, covering unfair dismissal compensation and failure to follow TUPE consultation procedures.

EAT rules on dismissal compensation

Orthet Limited v Vince-Cain, EAT, 3 March 2004

Vince-Cain, a regional manager whose salary was £32,000, was dismissed by her employer.

Read more items tagged with the same topics

Manage your tracked topics>

About this resource

Published date: 11 January 2005
Publisher: RBI
Source: Personnel Today

Explore XpertHR

Learn more

Customers

Get in touch

Connect with us

The materials and information included in the XpertHR service are provided for reference purposes only. They are not intended either as a substitute for professional advice or judgment or to provide legal or other advice with respect to particular circumstances. Use of the service is subject to our terms and conditions.

View our privacy policy, cookie policy and supported browsers.