Case roundup: TUPE transfers and unfair dismissal
This report relates to 2 case(s)
-
expand
Post Office v Liddiard [2001] All ER (D) 46 (Jun) CA
(3 other reports)
-
- Date:
- 1 October 2001
Two apparently contradictory judgements address whether treatment must have any material consequences to constitute a detriment under discrimination law. Plus, cases on Tupe, termination payments and unfair dismissal for misconduct unrelated to employment
-
- Date:
- 1 October 2001
Organisations worried about damage to their reputations from the out-of-hours misconduct of employees could be justified in sacking them.
-
- Date:
- 1 August 2001
In Post Office v Liddiard, the Court of Appeal sets aside an employment tribunal's decision that the dismissal of an employee following his involvement in football hooliganism was unfair.
-
expand
Transport & General Workers' Union v James McKinnon, JR (Haulage) Ltd and others [2001] IRLR 597 EAT
(1 other report)
-
- Date:
- 1 October 2001
Two apparently contradictory judgements address whether treatment must have any material consequences to constitute a detriment under discrimination law. Plus, cases on Tupe, termination payments and unfair dismissal for misconduct unrelated to employment
This week's case roundup, covering failure to inform and
consult on a TUPE transfer and dismissal as a result of bringing an employer into disrepute.
View the full article today
Register to read this article
Already an XpertHR user?
Log in
